- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Sticking it to the man
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Sticking it to the man"
Collapse
-
This thread features in this week's CUK newsletter! I wonder how such things are selected, considering it's not exactly a hotbed of discussion!
-
Don't they have laws about "cruel & unusual punishments"?Originally posted by sadkingbilly View Postthe septics deserve all they get.
Just asking like.
.
Then again they did revolt against a King & Tariffs.
No fecking consistency at all.
.
Leave a comment:
-
They are, which is why I think they are willing to take the risk.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostAren't they very rich?
Colombia University bent over and still got shafted, so there's no incentive to even contemplate what's being asked of them.
I see now that the IRS are seeing if they can remove the charitable tax-exempt status because Trump says Harvard is a political entity. And DHS is looking at how to stop them from enrolling foreign students.
Leave a comment:
-
Sticking it to the man
https://arstechnica.com/science/2025...to-a-takeover/
Basically, the Trump administration sent a list of demands to Harvard and Harvard said "nope". Stand off ensues. $2.2bn of federal funding at stake.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: