• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Sticking it to the man"

Collapse

  • ladymuck
    replied
    This thread features in this week's CUK newsletter! I wonder how such things are selected, considering it's not exactly a hotbed of discussion!

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Originally posted by sadkingbilly View Post
    the septics deserve all they get.
    Don't they have laws about "cruel & unusual punishments"?

    Just asking like. .

    Then again they did revolt against a King & Tariffs.

    No fecking consistency at all. .

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    the septics deserve all they get.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Aren't they very rich?
    They are, which is why I think they are willing to take the risk.

    Colombia University bent over and still got shafted, so there's no incentive to even contemplate what's being asked of them.

    I see now that the IRS are seeing if they can remove the charitable tax-exempt status because Trump says Harvard is a political entity. And DHS is looking at how to stop them from enrolling foreign students.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Aren't they very rich?

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    started a topic Sticking it to the man

    Sticking it to the man

    https://arstechnica.com/science/2025...to-a-takeover/

    Basically, the Trump administration sent a list of demands to Harvard and Harvard said "nope". Stand off ensues. $2.2bn of federal funding at stake.

Working...
X