Originally posted by Zigenare
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "MPs and peers should declare links to firms they back for contracts, says NAO..."
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Zigenare View PostIt's nice to see that Labour are beyond reproach in all this.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Streeting.html
Obscure firm handed £340,000 gift to Labour MPs Yvette Cooper, Dan Jarvis and Wes Streeting- Three Labour MPs have received more than £340,000 from MPM Connect Ltd
- The firm has been the third-biggest donor to MPs since the general election
- But it has zero public presence with no office, website or phone number
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View Post
FTFY
https://soviethistory.msu.edu/1956-2/dachas/
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
Oh I love a good political corruption discussion with my foreign born and brought up colleagues. British Royals, politicians, peers and police are complete amateurs.
Leave a comment:
-
MPs and peers should declare links to firms they back for contracts, says NAO...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...racts-says-nao
How about they don't fooking back contracts for any firms whilst being MP/peer and also like a minimum of 10 years after they stop being one?
Banana republics have more subtle corruptionTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Yesterday 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 14 15:46
- What the housing market needs at Autumn Budget 2025 Sep 10 20:58
- Qdos hit by cybersecurity ‘attack’ Sep 10 01:01
- Why party conference season 2025 is a self-employment policy litmus test Sep 9 09:53
Leave a comment: