Reply to: Got 2 free subs to the ToryGraph

[jamesbrown]

If someone doesn't mind sharing

Sure. It's roughly: Settings > Privacy and security > Site settings > JavaScript > Not allowed to use JavaScript > Add > https://www.telegraph.co.uk

Yer welcome.

[AtW]

Both subs given away, sorry!

[Delectable]

If someone doesn't mind sharing, please let me know and I'll PM as I'll like access. Thanks.

[BR14]

Shamelessly exploiting cretinism is completely ethical because it contributes to less cretinism, in theory.

But it's me who is paying the money, so it's me they are exploiting...

Q.E.D.

[jamesbrown]

But it's me who is paying the money, so it's me they are exploiting...

Yes, we are exploiting them and you.

Don't be exploited. Ditch your worthless subscriptions and circumvent their crappy js paywall.

[AtW]

Shamelessly exploiting cretinism is completely ethical because it contributes to less cretinism, in theory.

But it's me who is paying the money, so it's me they are exploiting...

[jamesbrown]

It's the kind of unethical behavior I don't allow myself to fall to, having said that I am still 50/50 if paying money to ToryGraph is actually ethical in the first place...

Shamelessly exploiting cretinism is completely ethical because it contributes to less cretinism, in theory.

[AtW]

It’s the Tory graph. I don’t need to subscribe as it’s paywall is JavaScript based, less useful than a chocolate teapot and less secure than an server using log4j

It's the kind of unethical behavior I don't allow myself to fall to, having said that I am still 50/50 if paying money to ToryGraph is actually ethical in the first place...

[AtW]

I think I vaguely remember once giving you a like. Am I eligible?

PMed!

[OwlHoot]

People and sockies who gave me most likes will get preference...

I think I vaguely remember once giving you a like. Am I eligible?

The Torygraph website would be better if it published only articles from 30 years ago

[jamesbrown]

It’s the Tory graph. I don’t need to subscribe as it’s paywall is JavaScript based, less useful than a chocolate teapot and less secure than an server using log4j

Precisely.

[SueEllen]

You get it whether you like it or not - PM me for a link and then make up a new disposable email for sign up, this way I'll have plausible deniability that you are my favourite sockie

PM sent.

I already have a few email addresses for spam stuff so I will use one of those.

[eek]

It’s the Tory graph. I don’t need to subscribe as it’s paywall is JavaScript based, less useful than a chocolate teapot and less secure than an server using log4j

[AtW]

You get it whether you like it or not - PM me for a link and then make up a new disposable email for sign up, this way I'll have plausible deniability that you are my favourite sockie

[SueEllen]

Nah.

It has too many words and supports known liars.

Prefer if it just clearly makes up stories like The Metro.