Originally posted by _V_
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Red Tape and Paperwork Whine
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Red Tape and Paperwork Whine"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by gruntling View PostSo for a 3-month initial inside (grrr) role. I've been sent 12 sheets of A4 in a word doc to fill out by the agency! Realistically it's going to take a couple of hours to fill out things in the most basic way.
I'm asked for last 5 year's worth of companies with contacts (even although at least one doesn't exist anymore!) and employment gaps of 28 days or more "to be explained" and detailed answers to how the umbrella works.
Admittedly this is in security and I had a similar pain with an investment bank a few years back so it might just be the industry sector but I'm sure things never used to be this bad 10-15 years old?
Are agencies more risk-adverse in the post IR35 changes, are they collecting details of past employers for leads, or are things just bonkers?
Obviously this isn't an SC application but that's the only time I've ever been asked for that much detail
Leave a comment:
-
Let's face it, without hiring managers on the form, they are just going to drop it in the bin anyway.
Leave a comment:
-
If you got the roles through an agency put the agency down. They should have a record that you worked on a particular assignment for a company.
If you got the roles direct then you should put the HR of the company down. Most companies have a policy that only HR are allowed to give references and they tend to just be dates.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gruntling View PostSo for a 3-month initial inside (grrr) role. I've been sent 12 sheets of A4 in a word doc to fill out by the agency! Realistically it's going to take a couple of hours to fill out things in the most basic way.
I'm asked for last 5 year's worth of companies with contacts (even although at least one doesn't exist anymore!) and employment gaps of 28 days or more "to be explained" and detailed answers to how the umbrella works.
Admittedly this is in security and I had a similar pain with an investment bank a few years back so it might just be the industry sector but I'm sure things never used to be this bad 10-15 years old?
Are agencies more risk-adverse in the post IR35 changes, are they collecting details of past employers for leads, or are things just bonkers?
Just put down "HR" for the contact. That's what I always do. If questioned by the agency just tell them it's the policy of the client that all refs must go through HR Then the form is pretty much like your CV
Leave a comment:
-
Red Tape and Paperwork Whine
So for a 3-month initial inside (grrr) role. I've been sent 12 sheets of A4 in a word doc to fill out by the agency! Realistically it's going to take a couple of hours to fill out things in the most basic way.
I'm asked for last 5 year's worth of companies with contacts (even although at least one doesn't exist anymore!) and employment gaps of 28 days or more "to be explained" and detailed answers to how the umbrella works.
Admittedly this is in security and I had a similar pain with an investment bank a few years back so it might just be the industry sector but I'm sure things never used to be this bad 10-15 years old?
Are agencies more risk-adverse in the post IR35 changes, are they collecting details of past employers for leads, or are things just bonkers?
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Today 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Yesterday 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Leave a comment: