Reply to: Johnny Depp Is A Wife Beater

[Paddy]

This court case wasn't a criminal prosecution. Depp chose to sue for libel. On the balance of probabilities, the Sun article was found to be substantively true.

I know that; I suggested that there should be a prosecution.

[Old Greg]

sorry did I tread on your toes?

No, you put your foot in your mouth.

[vetran]

That's just you walking around with tulip on your shoes.

sorry did I tread on your toes?

[Old Greg]

well you smell of another type of movement!

That's just you walking around with tulip on your shoes.

[vetran]

I was asking you as you smell of the incel movement.

well you smell of another type of movement!

[Old Greg]

I'd have to bow to you superior knowledge there.

I was asking you as you smell of the incel movement.

[NigelJK]

I'd have to bow to you superior knowledge there.

[Old Greg]

I agree, sadly the main stream media seem intent on pursuing/destroying only one party. It should be noted that the case only discussed The Suns right to call him 'wife beater' and nothing else.

What is the incel media saying?

[AtW]

Depp should have asked to move venue on a more neutral ground - Liverpool, with local jury of his peers

[Old Greg]

If she physically abused him then she should be prosecuted but it is still no excuse for him to abuse her. Two wrongs don't make a right. Both actions are despicable.

This court case wasn't a criminal prosecution. Depp chose to sue for libel. On the balance of probabilities, the Sun article was found to be substantively true.

[NigelJK]

I agree, sadly the main stream media seem intent on pursuing/destroying only one party. It should be noted that the case only discussed The Suns right to call him 'wife beater' and nothing else.

[Paddy]

Odd that it was also patently true that she physically abuse him but for that there is 'no charge'. I'm guessing the action was against The Sun and they only deliberated on the specific item in question not the evidentially toxic relationship.

If she physically abused him then she should be prosecuted but it is still no excuse for him to abuse her. Two wrongs don't make a right. Both actions are despicable.

[vetran]

Odd that it was also patently true that she physically abuse him but for that there is 'no charge'. I'm guessing the action was against The Sun and they only deliberated on the specific item in question not the evidentially toxic relationship.

That's next month in the US during the haggling over the money.

as you say they both seem very unpleasant.

[NigelJK]

Odd that it was also patently true that she physically abuse him but for that there is 'no charge'. I'm guessing the action was against The Sun and they only deliberated on the specific item in question not the evidentially toxic relationship.

[Paddy]

Johnny Depp '''won’t be able to work in Hollywood''' again after bombshell wife-beater verdict

JOHNNY Depp won't be able to work in Hollywood again after a judge sensationally ruled he attacked Amber Heard, industry experts say.

The star today lost his blockbuster libel case against The Sun, who referred to him as a "wife-beater" in 2018.

This news left me absolutely disgusted of him.