Originally posted by WTFH
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Right-wing academics ‘forced to hide views’"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostWhich I have quoted in my earlier post, but you chose to ignore. You've also only linked to 1 post not 15, and not a post from me.
Nor have you linked to where you answered the question directly, without being evasive, without "FTFY", and without your pitchfork fetish.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View Postthere you go P4 post 38.
It is like arguing with a child.
Which I have quoted in my earlier post, but you chose to ignore. You've also only linked to 1 post not 15, and not a post from me.
Nor have you linked to where you answered the question directly, without being evasive, without "FTFY", and without your pitchfork fetish.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostFTFY
From your links quoted its obvious I answered the question respecting the knowledge available at the time the decisions made.
That is the problem with hindsight it is so often used by arseholes to make decisions after the facts become available.
How would you have answered the question other than he was a tory MP so he must be guilty despite at the time he still being under investigation or sub judice?
Originally posted by vetran View PostI am not the idiot who asked the same question 15 times.
As you rightly say, you are using hindsight, as you often do. I posted a link to the sentence being passed out and then you meltdown.
Every time you do a "FTFY" to change what was said, it's because of hindsight.
You make up false claims - such as saying that the question was first asked on Page 4, post 38.
Originally posted by vetran View PostActually it has , but Barmy & you are apparently slow on the uptake, because he has asked it repeatedly.
It was first asked on page 4 post 38. Try the thread search its pretty good.
I do try to provide answers in the face of the drivel. You boys just make tulip up and then accuse posters of being stupid.Originally posted by darmstadt View PostReally, how about Elphicke who was suspended:
Originally posted by vetran View PostAh so someone completely different was tried and found guilty? What has that got to do with your pitchfork fetish? Are all male white MPs guilty by default?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostYou didn't because you made it up.
he hasn't answered it the way I wanted.
We're still trying to understand your answers you supplied below.
https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post2794888
https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post2794899
https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post2794912
FTFY
From your links quoted its obvious I answered the question respecting the knowledge available at the time the decisions made.
That is the problem with hindsight it is so often used by arseholes to make decisions after the facts become available.
How would you have answered the question other than he was a tory MP so he must be guilty despite at the time he still being under investigation or sub judice?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: