• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Standing up to China"

Collapse

  • GhostofTarbera
    replied
    Originally posted by elsergiovolador View Post
    Why would they think that "our" way is better?
    Because they have watched Harry Potter


    Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum

    Leave a comment:


  • elsergiovolador
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    I don't know how much Chinese students integrate but I was thinking that another loss would be that students go back to China with a more western perspective, which could change China for the better in the future.
    Why would they think that "our" way is better?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    China Trade bill (2000; 106th Congress H.R. 4444) - GovTrack.us

    It became law 4 weeks before the election of Bush and months before he became president.

    Seriously, do you ever pause to think that your "I'm on this side so I have to say this" schtick makes you say utter gibberish?
    * From China’s request to resume its status as a contractingparty to the GATT to its final accession to the WTO, it tookChina 15 years to go through the arduous and prolongednegotiations.
    ∗ On July 10, 1986, China formally submitted to the GATTSecretariat its request of resumption of China’s status as acontracting party to the GATT.
    ∗ In November 1995, China formally requested to accede to theWTO.
    ∗ On December 11, 2001, China officially became WTO’s 143rdmember.

    https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/acc_e/s7lu_e.pdf

    Monday marked the fifteenth anniversary of U.S. President George W. Bush’s 2001 decision to sign a proclamation granting China permanent normal trading relations (PNTR) with the United States.
    ...
    He counts U.S. support for China’s entry into the World Trade Organization, followed by the granting of PNTR in 2001

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    I think you will find that George Bush helped them more than Clinton, he was also president when they joined....
    China Trade bill (2000; 106th Congress H.R. 4444) - GovTrack.us

    It became law 4 weeks before the election of Bush and months before he became president.

    Seriously, do you ever pause to think that your "I'm on this side so I have to say this" schtick makes you say utter gibberish?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Clinton let them into the WTO thinking the same thing.
    I think you will find that George Bush helped them more than Clinton, he was also president when they joined....

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    There's an old Vulcan proverb... 'Only Nixon could go to China' - YouTube

    "Only Nixon could go to China".

    Dumb mother****er.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    I don't know how much Chinese students integrate but I was thinking that another loss would be that students go back to China with a more western perspective, which could change China for the better in the future.
    Clinton let them into the WTO thinking the same thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    I wonder if all the fanbois will throw away their Apple gear? I wonder if datacenters will remove all their Lenovo equipment? The list goes on and on....

    Leave a comment:


  • Scruff
    replied
    Shrink the Uni's and push up the price for Foreign Students. Why they have to be so large, and dependent on fees is simply because they decided to run them like (inefficient) businesses - growth for growth's sake - keep academia academic, FFS.

    China are never going to change because the US / UK alliance make some "strategic" commercial decisions - China are still engaged with UK Nuclear...that's not going to change!

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    China is a capitalist country.
    If capitalism means the private ownership of production and land then no. It's not even close.

    All workers are in government controlled unions, most companies have CCP committees that control the board and you are now 'expected' to put the CCP in the articles of association. The only regulated lending is state controlled and all regulators are not independent from government.

    You might have a stock exchange but you are buying slices of government controlled enterprises.

    But then if your primary knowledge of capitalism comes from reading das kapital when you're 17 then you'll probably regard it is capitalism.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    The UK universities are very nervous as one in four students are Chinese, there could be big losses of revenue.
    I don't know how much Chinese students integrate but I was thinking that another loss would be that students go back to China with a more western perspective, which could change China for the better in the future.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    The UK universities are very nervous as one in four students are Chinese, there could be big losses of revenue.
    Esp bad here, as fees are free the unis have to fill them with Chinese to make money. Some courses must be 90% Chinese I reckon and there are loads of massive buildings around town to cater for them.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    The UK universities are very nervous as one in four students are Chinese, there could be big losses of revenue.
    My cousin's partner used to spend a lot of time in HK and China recruiting students for some university or other. One suspects they don't have much of a job any more

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by PCTNN View Post
    Can someone let me know if, with regards to China, we hold all the cards?
    The UK universities are very nervous as one in four students are Chinese, there could be big losses of revenue.

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Trump is throwing Boris under double decker bus (made in China)
    With "£350M for the NHS" written on the side?

    I'd pay good money to watch that.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X