Originally posted by vetran
View Post
Your post implies that the microphone was faulty for not picking up something you have stated multiple times was yelled.
That is why I asked you outright in the next and subsequent posts.
If you had said
"yelled the words Allah Akbar" -maybe when he said that, it's not yelled loud enough to be clear on her mic.
that would have conferred the meaning you now obviously meant.
This is why I questioned it repeatedly.
I am perfectly happy to believe that he was out of range or the clip started after he said it hence mentioning the witness.
But if you meant it happened why do you suggest the audio in this case is more reliable than a witness?
Why if you agree it was uttered why do you suggest the Mail made it up?
etc.
Leave a comment: