• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "ToryGraph article comments"

Collapse

  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by rogerfederer View Post
    To be fair, Old Greg adds some much needed humour and a valuable sense of perspective.

    You add some legacy words, such as 'plonker' and 'bampot' and contribute very little, if anything, of substance to any thread.
    To be fair, he is a useful baseline for measuring other cretins against.

    Leave a comment:


  • rogerfederer
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post


    Might have to ask for a refund
    Stop funding them then?

    Subscribe to the Financial Times for quality business news. You're in love with being aghast at some of the purposefully divisive fake news articles the Torygraph throw up and keep opening threads with some copy/paste rubbish from it.

    If you construct a sluice to let the excrement in AND pay for it, what do you expect?

    Leave a comment:


  • rogerfederer
    replied
    Originally posted by BR14 View Post
    better than any polythene paddy any any old time.
    To be fair, Old Greg adds some much needed humour and a valuable sense of perspective.

    You add some legacy words, such as 'plonker' and 'bampot' and contribute very little, if anything, of substance to any thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Female, a pulse and a mention in dispatches? That's AtW wank fodder.
    And lives >100 miles away so no real danger.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Hmmm. I note atW liked that post! Maybe you are providing the therapy he needs!
    Female, a pulse and a mention in dispatches? That's AtW wank fodder.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    Why do you protect them so much? AtW hasn't contributed much other than negative whiny dross for a long time now and, short of some serious therapy, I doubt they will ever stop. What makes their brand of negativity so special? Yes they are one of many on my ignore list but it doesn't make them go away.
    Hmmm. I note atW liked that post! Maybe you are providing the therapy he needs!

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by BR14 View Post
    and you're just a moronic polythene padraig who couldn't cut it in England and had to move to where there are people even thicker than you.
    Yet I'm still clever enough to know why the Mods are nasty old meanies to you.

    Leave a comment:


  • BR14
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Because you're a streak of piss. I know you're slow, but try to keep up. We've been over this.
    and you're just a moronic polythene padraig who couldn't cut it in England and had to move to where there are people even thicker than you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by BR14 View Post
    whereas YOU've got me on a personal hitlist for some reason, known only to you.
    can you tell me why the 'rules' in General are different for me rather than everyone else?
    do elucidate, herr brush.
    Because you're a streak of piss. I know you're slow, but try to keep up. We've been over this.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    Why do you protect them so much? AtW hasn't contributed much other than negative whiny dross for a long time now and, short of some serious therapy, I doubt they will ever stop. What makes their brand of negativity so special? Yes they are one of many on my ignore list but it doesn't make them go away.
    It really depends on how many complaints we receive, how our personal irritation (or boredom) levels are, surviving the dice roll and of course how many compromising photos you have.

    Originally posted by BR14 View Post
    whereas YOU've got me on a personal hitlist for some reason, known only to you.
    Reminds me of old times when SY01 was convinced that I was out to get him. Maybe I should change my piccy to be V for Vendetta again.
    can you tell me why the 'rules' in General are different for me rather than everyone else?
    do elucidate, herr brush.
    Everyone has different rules. We aim for a tailored experience.

    Boom boom.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    A bit gammony?
    A bit non-existent - I thought the Telegraph had abolished reader comments yonks ago, not that I'd pay for a subscription like AtW to find out

    Leave a comment:


  • BR14
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    AtW is a reasonably sensible chap, for a paranoid depressive Russian. My guess he's got BR14 on ignore.
    whereas YOU've got me on a personal hitlist for some reason, known only to you.
    can you tell me why the 'rules' in General are different for me rather than everyone else?
    do elucidate, herr brush.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Leave him be. He's only a Lonely Old Onanist Brexiteer.
    AtW is a reasonably sensible chap, for a paranoid depressive Russian. My guess he's got BR14 on ignore.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    I'm fairly sure I told you to STFU or put AtW on your ignore list. Would you like to make a choice?
    Why do you protect them so much? AtW hasn't contributed much other than negative whiny dross for a long time now and, short of some serious therapy, I doubt they will ever stop. What makes their brand of negativity so special? Yes they are one of many on my ignore list but it doesn't make them go away.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Leave him be. He's only a Lonely Old Onanist Brexiteer.
    Chin up, old fudgy knickers.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X