- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Will you download the app?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Will you download the app?"
Collapse
-
Still not quite world beating: Fault in NHS Covid app meant thousands at risk did not quarantine | World news | The Guardian
-
Germany is helping the UK develop its COVID-19 contact-tracing app, says ambassador • The Register
I've seen the documentation that the Germans sent, it's basically 12 sentences:
Code:git clone https://github.com/corona-warn-app/cwa-app-android.git ...
and so on for the other 11 repositories....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostIt's a shame they gave up. They could have got Clive Sinclair to develop a new world-beating BritPhone that the world-beating app would work on.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mordac View PostIt was widely known and reported (e.g. here) that the NHS in-house App was not going to function as claimed.
Testing something that could potentially work is obviously important, but testing something that could never actually work was a complete waste of time and money, and has made the government look like idiots. It's difficult to blame the media on this one (for a change).
Whoever was advising them on the technical side needs a large
Leave a comment:
-
Any iOS developer who has worked with Bluetooth could have told them that the app was unlikely to work reliably in the background due to the limitations and throttling in place for background Bluetooth apps.
I was able to put together a test app that proves this using an Apple sample code project. Not sure it was warranted to spend £500k on a full blown proof of concept. The right thing to do would have been to switch to the decentralised model using the Apple and Google API as soon as it was announced.
The government claims they’ve devised a better algorithm than Apple/Google for determining proximity but I’m very skeptical of this. Let them publish a technical paper explaining how. They have access to the same limited data that the Apple/Google APIs do - they collect the device TX power, a time series of RSSI values and they also capture your device model and OS during registration. That’s it.
Bluetooth proximity is unreliable and this will be the case with Apple/Google too.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ladymuck View PostI think it was right to investigate other options before blindly accepting the Apple/Google offering. You can mutter till the cows come home over whether the right approach was taken - as is typical of tech projects, ask three people their thoughts and you'll get five opinions.
A pilot was absolutely the right thing to do; why roll out a product developed at speed without real world testing? Can you imagine the uproar that would have ensued if they went straight to live and some tech journo found a bug?
They've actually followed good project protocol by building something, testing it, and halting when it didn't work. How many other government tech projects have you seen where they just keep chucking money at it even though it's crap?
The main issue, is HMG/NHS overselling the app and the media forever being hungry to nit pick and leap upon any news as evidence of whatever agenda they want to push.
Testing something that could potentially work is obviously important, but testing something that could never actually work was a complete waste of time and money, and has made the government look like idiots. It's difficult to blame the media on this one (for a change).
Whoever was advising them on the technical side needs a large
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ladymuck View PostI think it was right to investigate other options before blindly accepting the Apple/Google offering. You can mutter till the cows come home over whether the right approach was taken - as is typical of tech projects, ask three people their thoughts and you'll get five opinions.
A pilot was absolutely the right thing to do; why roll out a product developed at speed without real world testing? Can you imagine the uproar that would have ensued if they went straight to live and some tech journo found a bug?
They've actually followed good project protocol by building something, testing it, and halting when it didn't work. How many other government tech projects have you seen where they just keep chucking money at it even though it's crap?
The main issue, is HMG/NHS overselling the app and the media forever being hungry to nit pick and leap upon any news as evidence of whatever agenda they want to push.
Leave a comment:
-
I think it was right to investigate other options before blindly accepting the Apple/Google offering. You can mutter till the cows come home over whether the right approach was taken - as is typical of tech projects, ask three people their thoughts and you'll get five opinions.
A pilot was absolutely the right thing to do; why roll out a product developed at speed without real world testing? Can you imagine the uproar that would have ensued if they went straight to live and some tech journo found a bug?
They've actually followed good project protocol by building something, testing it, and halting when it didn't work. How many other government tech projects have you seen where they just keep chucking money at it even though it's crap?
The main issue, is HMG/NHS overselling the app and the media forever being hungry to nit pick and leap upon any news as evidence of whatever agenda they want to push.
Leave a comment:
-
"If all you illegal immigrants could just download the app so we'll have a chance of finding you please."
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cojak View PostI would LOVE to see the the government provided fag packet that the requirements were written on. I'll bet that there was a lot of white space there...Last edited by Scruff; 19 June 2020, 10:11.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostSerco didn't develop the app, they had the contract for the wider test and trace program though. The apps themselves were developed by VMWare Pivotal Labs.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Yesterday 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Leave a comment: