• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Bank of England to temporarily finance UK government spending"

Collapse

  • DodgyAccountant
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Cant’t work in modern world
    1944 - Bretton Woods

    to

    15/08/1971 - Nixon 'temporarily' suspends convertability of USD to gold

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by CheeseSlice View Post
    One danger of fiat money is that governments will print too much of it, resulting in hyperinflation"

    Just beware when Rishi Sunak starts scattering his endless supply of crisp fresh £50 notes over our financial problems like it was confetti.

    Before that can happen though, there's a need to increase the physical money supply. Before that time, we're more likely to have deflation. A lot of it. People want cash, can't get it (see below) then this results in people not spending it. You can thank the Tories in the mid-80's for bank deregulation for the pickle we're in now.

    'Money Supply M1 in the United Kingdom increased to 1835526 GBP Million in February from 1814637 GBP Million in January of 2020.'

    'Money Supply M2 in the United Kingdom increased to 2472269 GBP Million in February from 2471137 GBP Million in January of 2020.'


    So a difference of £0.6 trillion that does not actually exist but a computer in the BoE says it does. Crt-Alt-Del, that'll fix it.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    The Bitcoin standard it is then!
    Tulipcoins can’t work either, obviously

    Leave a comment:


  • CheeseSlice
    replied
    Originally posted by Martin@AS Financial View Post
    From Investopedia: "Fiat money is government-issued currency that isn't backed by a commodity such as gold. Fiat money gives governments' central banks greater control over the economy because they control how much currency is printed. One danger of fiat money is that governments will print too much of it, resulting in hyperinflation"

    Just beware when Rishi Sunak starts scattering his endless supply of crisp fresh £50 notes over our financial problems like it was confetti.

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    <old gag>That's the good thing about Bitcoin standards, there's so many to choose from</old gag>

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Cant’t work in modern world
    The Bitcoin standard it is then!

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    I'm ready for it... are you?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    The gold standard can't return soon enough.
    Cant’t work in modern world

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    The gold standard can't return soon enough.
    Oh dear.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    The gold standard can't return soon enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • rootsnall
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    And who was the buyer - BoE?
    Yes, this method cuts out the middleman from taking their cut. The banks are quite happy to buy the govt bonds from the govt knowing they can then sell them back to the govt at a profit.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    From what I recall, they were at 3x oversubscribed on the last sale.

    At least for now, there's nothing to see here.

    This is a standard mechanism, a drop in the ocean in terms of amount and the facility was also extended during the last crisis.
    And who was the buyer - BoE?

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    So guilts not selling well then
    From what I recall, they were at 3x oversubscribed on the last sale.

    At least for now, there's nothing to see here.

    This is a standard mechanism, a drop in the ocean in terms of amount and the facility was also extended during the last crisis.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by _V_ View Post
    You mean Gilts?
    I think the spelling was deliberate.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    It was called an 'overdraft' on R4 this morning.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X