Modern Luxury flats

[d000hg]

Didn't we do this story a year ago?

[Paddy]

[LondonManc]

That would need to be backed by a QC opinion

Worked well for loan schemes....

[AtW]

That would need to be backed by a QC opinion

[northernladuk]

Contrary to what the NLyUK said last time you engaged her services, people are allowed to be naked within private premises

But a group of people blokes all doing the 'helicopter' all day facing the viewing gallery may be pushing it a bit.

[SimonMac]

So what if owners hired some nudists, would that be illegal?

Contrary to what the NLyUK said last time you engaged her services, people are allowed to be naked within private premises

[AtW]

So what if owners hired some nudists, would that be illegal?

[sal]

Hurrah for sanity

[AtW]

“ Residents of flats overlooked by the Tate Modern have lost the latest round of their legal battle with the gallery at the court of appeal.

The owners of four flats in the Neo Bankside development on London’s South Bank took legal action in an attempt to stop “hundreds of thousands of visitors” looking into their homes from the Tate’s viewing platform.

They applied for an injunction requiring the gallery to prevent members of the public observing their flats by cordoning off parts of the platform or erecting screening, to stop what they said was a “relentless” invasion of their privacy.”

Luxury flat owners lose privacy appeal against Tate Modern viewpoint | Art and design | The Guardian