• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The tax man is coming (to Australia)"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    It’s a fantasy to think that large by value registrable property won’t be fully reported to tax man.

    HMRC already got DVLA, Land Registry, Companies House etc info.

    Only problem if you are a tax fraud.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    And the problem is exactly what, violation of privacy rights of tax evaders?

    When they’re requesting the information from the insurance companies they don’t know whether they are tax evaders or not.

    Whether it’s a “violation of privacy rights” depends on whether or not you, as a private and law-abiding citizen, are happy with your insurance details being passed to the tax man for them to pore over.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by JonSmile View Post
    It appears that the Aussie tax man is unhappy with some people’s tax returns and is asking insurance companies for policy details of “high end” assets to compare to submissions.
    And the problem is exactly what, violation of privacy rights of tax evaders?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    Oi...

    My car was only £16k when I bought it 10 years ago

    you call yourself a drug dealer? £16k would just about pay for your signet ring.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Well it is - you can get a car which fulfils the function of getting you from A to B for less than that.
    You can... but who'd want to? Your chauffeur would refuse to get behind the wheel.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    or getting insurance on their 7 series/Range Rover.

    However knowing who owns a £30k+ car and is reporting earning £10k living in Kensington etc. is probably a very good test.
    Oi...

    My car was only £16k when I bought it 10 years ago

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    or getting insurance on their 7 series/Range Rover.

    However knowing who owns a £30k+ car and is reporting earning £10k living in Kensington etc. is probably a very good test.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    The point is that the tax man is reconciling assets against income. May not happen here (are insurance records subject to GDPR? Can the tax man go on a fishing expedition by requesting blanket records for everyone?).

    Even if it did happen here, the Russian oligarchs and Sarf London drug dealers are hardly likely to be furnishing tax returns anyway

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by JonSmile View Post
    It appears that the Aussie tax man is unhappy with some people’s tax returns and is asking insurance companies for policy details of “high end” assets to compare to submissions.

    Apparently a car over £34k is classed as luxury.


    ATO ‘red flags’: Tax office requests insurance information on taxpayers




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Well it is - you can get a car which fulfils the function of getting you from A to B for less than that.

    Leave a comment:


  • JonSmile
    replied
    Ok. I was paraphrasing.

    It called them “lifestyle assets”




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    The tax man is coming (to Australia)

    Where does it say that it’s classed as luxury?

    Leave a comment:


  • JonSmile
    started a topic The tax man is coming (to Australia)

    The tax man is coming (to Australia)

    It appears that the Aussie tax man is unhappy with some people’s tax returns and is asking insurance companies for policy details of “high end” assets to compare to submissions.

    Apparently a car over £34k is classed as luxury.


    ATO ‘red flags’: Tax office requests insurance information on taxpayers




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Working...
X