• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Seats difference if there was PR in the UK"

Collapse

  • d000hg
    replied
    As someone mentioned we did have a referendum on voting reform about a decade ago - I barely remember it though so it must have been before I had any interest in politics?

    Or maybe nobody had much interest in it?

    edit: 42% turnout, I'd forgotten it was a fop to the LDs in return for tuition fees
    2011 United Kingdom Alternative Vote referendum - Wikipedia

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    The problem with PR is that UK politics don’t know how to form coalitions, and less so know how to effectively govern from them. The last two junior partners (LibDems and DUP) we seen as a necessary nuisance rather than a partner

    Leave a comment:


  • JohntheBike
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    How does that work when PC, SNP, etc only stand in their respective nations?
    Wouldn't we need some sort of PR based per-nation, or does that cause more problems?

    Seems we'd still have a majority Tory government either way.
    I guess there is no bar to anyone standing in any election anywhere in the UK. So theoretically, an SNP/DUP/PC candidate could stand anywhere in England. It would be pointless I know, but it would be interesting if the SNP fielded candidates in Northern England. However, I guess people forget that this "United" Kingdom has different laws for Scotland and NI from England and Wales, and has had so for a very long time.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    What is irrelevant is posting numbers with no understanding or analysis of what they actually mean..
    This time next year BTC to the moon!

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    What “appeals” is irrelevant.

    HTH, BIDI.
    What is irrelevant is posting numbers with no understanding or analysis of what they actually mean.

    HTH. Not that I care.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    No, doesn't work like that.

    On those numbers, Tories have 288 seats, Lab/SNP/LD have 304. So a rainbow coalition would be in charge. Can't say that appeals...

    And SNP/DUP/SF/PC/whatever seats are still UK National seats, so no need to adjust for local nationality.
    What “appeals” is irrelevant.

    HTH, BIDI.

    Leave a comment:


  • BR14
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    What's been achieved in the last 5 years of Tory government? Fook all and a sheet load of money up in smoke.
    and this is relevant? - go back to your magic beans thread, there's a good Erik

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    A proper PR system would be more democratic but not sure what the effect would be.

    What's been achieved in the last 5 years of Tory government? Fook all and a sheet load of money up in smoke.



    During the last coalition:



    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
    No you had not, that was on AV
    Don't be doing your mad 'facts' on here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eirikur
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    We had a referendum on PR in 2011. I was in favour. But the vast majority were not.

    Referendums only come round once in a generation. Though I think they should be banned altogether. Or maybe only allowed if parliament is in favour.
    No you had not, that was on AV

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    We had a referendum on PR in 2011. I was in favour. But the vast majority were not.

    Referendums only come round once in a generation. Though I think they should be banned altogether. Or maybe only allowed if parliament is in favour.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    How does that work when PC, SNP, etc only stand in their respective nations?
    Wouldn't we need some sort of PR based per-nation, or does that cause more problems?

    Seems we'd still have a majority Tory government either way.
    No, doesn't work like that.

    On those numbers, Tories have 288 seats, Lab/SNP/LD have 304. So a rainbow coalition would be in charge. Can't say that appeals...

    And SNP/DUP/SF/PC/whatever seats are still UK National seats, so no need to adjust for local nationality.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hobosapien
    replied
    The problem with proportional representation is that the non-voters (i.e. those that don't turnout) will always win so there would be no more MPs. Make it so.

    Leave a comment:


  • BR14
    replied


    we don't.

    Leave a comment:


  • MasterBait
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    How does that work when PC, SNP, etc only stand in their respective nations?
    Wouldn't we need some sort of PR based per-nation, or does that cause more problems?

    Seems we'd still have a majority Tory government either way.
    I agree with that, couldn't find a link that breaks it up per nation. the SNP had 45% of the votes in Scotland so would not have an absoloute majority 27 in stead of 48 out of the 59 Scottish seats

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X