• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Should the state let Michael Buerk die to save the NHS money?"

Collapse

  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Source? Or are Mods exempt from such tedium?

    Edit: Surely nobody is that stupid?

    Edit 2: It seems someone is that stupid . Although you attribute a quote from a Brexit Party supporter to the Party themselves. That is ever so slightly disingenuous, don't you think?
    Source:
    Catherine Blaiklock

    Replying to your Edit 2: The person in question is the founder of The Brexit Party and since being pulled up for the lack of facts in her post has left it out there, along with others that are short on fact.
    Is it disingenuous to post a lie, be told it is a lie and leave it out there as a lie? Is that more or less disingenuous than saying the founder of a party is posting something that is linked to that party?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    ‘Major operations are sold in Pakistan and performed by the NHS in London. Patients arrive at Heathrow and are collected and taken to Slough General. Everyone is on the take abusing the system.’

    ...according to the Brexit Party
    Source? Or are Mods exempt from such tedium?

    Edit: Surely nobody is that stupid?

    Edit 2: It seems someone is that stupid . Although you attribute a quote from a Brexit Party supporter to the Party themselves. That is ever so slightly disingenuous, don't you think?
    Last edited by Mordac; 7 August 2019, 20:42.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Wexham Park. Just saying...

    ‘Major operations are sold in Pakistan and performed by the NHS in London. Patients arrive at Heathrow and are collected and taken to Slough General. Everyone is on the take abusing the system.’

    ...according to the Brexit Party

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Slough General. You need to know your hospitals before you start making them up!
    Wexham Park. Just saying...

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    You've still got Nan...

    No, I think we had her for Christmas dinner several years ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    I’m not saying we refuse healthcare to those who are overweight, I’m still proposing that we eat old people.
    You've still got Nando's...

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Slough General. You need to know your hospitals before you start making them up!
    I visited there a few years ago. I think Ozzy Osbourne was there taking the standards down....

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Not at Slough hospital....

    Slough General. You need to know your hospitals before you start making them up!

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    In 2012, it was £9,000 per person per year for lung cancer, and there are about 44,500 new diagnosis each year and 20,000 deaths.
    Not at Slough hospital....

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post
    What is that in billions?
    And how much in billions is saved from the state pension?
    And factor in if they don’t die of lung cancer they’re still going die (that costs money), or even worse they live for 30 years as a dribbling alzheimer vegatable.....

    I don’t have answer to these questions. But I do know the answer isn’t to refuse health care to fatties.
    I’m not saying we refuse healthcare to those who are overweight, I’m still proposing that we eat old people.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    In 2012, it was £9,000 per person per year for lung cancer, and there are about 44,500 new diagnosis each year and 20,000 deaths.
    What is that in billions?
    And how much in billions is saved from the state pension?
    And factor in if they don’t die of lung cancer they’re still going die (that costs money), or even worse they live for 30 years as a dribbling alzheimer vegatable.....

    I don’t have answer to these questions. But I do know the answer isn’t to refuse health care to fatties.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    In 2012, it was £9,000 per person per year for lung cancer, and there are about 44,500 new diagnosis each year and 20,000 deaths.
    Thanks Lance.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    How much do you think their healthcare is going to cost?

    In 2012, it was £9,000 per person per year for lung cancer, and there are about 44,500 new diagnosis each year and 20,000 deaths.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post
    and here we agree.
    Solves the pension crisis as well.

    Anyone stupid enough to smoke can live (die) by their own consequences.
    How much do you think their healthcare is going to cost?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post

    But why should the state do it's best to keep you alive when you clearly have not taken that much interest in it...
    I think I'm right in saying you can't actually opt to go entirely private and avoid involvement with the NHS entirely for treatment in the UK. A private doctor has to have some interaction with your NHS GP, although I'm unsure of the details.

    But if that is the case, and the NHS takes it upon itself to force people to use its services one way or another in practice, then they have no right to criticise anyone's lifestyle choices or be selective about treatment.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X