• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Minister announces end to new-build leaseholds"

Collapse

  • Martin@AS Financial
    replied
    Leasehold: a Mortgage Strategy investigation

    Good article from Mortgage Strategy

    Leasehold: a Mortgage Strategy investigation - Mortgage Strategy

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    In which case you need to pay special attention to the running of the Freehold Ltd Co. Make sure the company does not get into a situation whereby it can have a compulsory winding-up order. Make sure it has a substantial sink (sinking) fund for unseen eventualities.

    precisely or they run up the list of shared jobs and they sell their flat before the bill becomes due.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Martin@AS Financial View Post
    The issue is that there are not enough good quality management agents. The vast majority that i have dealt with have been utterly woeful and tend to side with the freeholder.

    sounds like an area that needs legislation then.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Martin@AS Financial View Post
    The issue is that there are not enough good quality management agents. The vast majority that i have dealt with have been utterly woeful and tend to side with the freeholder.
    That's the whole point - I am effectively a freeholder by virtue of owning part of the company that owns freehold, the management company that actually does work in the building is hired by the company that owns freehold, ie - us (I am one of the Directors there), we approve things to be done.

    Granted it's a small block of just 8 flats, a lot easier to deal with fewer people involved.

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin@AS Financial
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Problem is that as more leaseholders are involved the harder it is to get a decision. Probably best if large blocks are professionally managed.
    The issue is that there are not enough good quality management agents. The vast majority that i have dealt with have been utterly woeful and tend to side with the freeholder.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Yes and that’s why leaseholds on flats like mine should work via freehold assigned to the company in which leaseholders own equal shares - this way service fee is managed but no crazy tulip can happen as easily as in most new big tower flats
    In which case you need to pay special attention to the running of the Freehold Ltd Co. Make sure the company does not get into a situation whereby it can have a compulsory winding-up order. Make sure it has a substantial sink (sinking) fund for unseen eventualities.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Problem is that as more leaseholders are involved the harder it is to get a decision. Probably best if large blocks are professionally managed.
    The key is for the flat leaseholders to own freehold via corp entity (plus have long like mine leaseholders of 900+ years with peppercorn rent), for houses leaseholding does not make sense

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Yes and that’s why leaseholds on flats like mine should work via freehold assigned to the company in which leaseholders own equal shares - this way service fee is managed but no crazy tulip can happen as easily as in most new big tower flats

    Problem is that as more leaseholders are involved the harder it is to get a decision. Probably best if large blocks are professionally managed.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Yes and that’s why leaseholds on flats like mine should work via freehold assigned to the company in which leaseholders own equal shares - this way service fee is managed but no crazy tulip can happen as easily as in most new big tower flats

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    This is an archaic law dating back to serfdom but all governments since haven't bothered to change it.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    Good.

    That was an awful idea for everyone apart from the developers.
    The proposal only refers to houses. The law needs to be changed (as in Scotland) that all leaseholds are converted to commonhold.

    There was a case where the freeholder of a block of flats repossessed an elderly lady's flat over a minor breach of the lease when she was absent for six months. She lost her appeal in the High Court because her appeal was out of time.

    Her flat was worth about £350,000 but she loses everything.

    Just to spell it out; if you lease a flat or house, you do not own it, you just rent it! If your leasehold flat or house is repossessed by the freeholder because you broke a term of the lease, you lose everything. This is an archaic law dating back to serfdom but the Tories love it.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    About time this scam was stopped

    The kebab flat on lease?

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Originally posted by Martin@AS Financial View Post
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    Good.

    That was an awful idea for everyone apart from the developers.
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    +1
    +2.

    An even worse system than the old leasehold which at least ran for 99 years.

    Even those cost an appreciable amount to get shot of.

    But nowhere near the astronomical amounts demanded more recently.

    Not to mention Ground Rent that went up equally astronomically ever decade or so.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    About time this scam was stopped

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    Good.

    That was an awful idea for everyone apart from the developers.

    +1

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X