• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Racism and Reverse Racism..."

Collapse

  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Second sentence, Shirley?
    Muni got-in to.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    It's ok. At the time it was a legitimate choice for the stupid and/or deluded. Nothing to be ashamed about.

    What is disingenuous is the claim that you're not allowed to discuss these thing. Because you are.
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    There you go. First sentence proves my point.
    Second sentence, Shirley?

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    It's ok. At the time it was a legitimate choice for the stupid and/or deluded. Nothing to be ashamed about.

    What is disingenuous is the claim that you're not allowed to discuss these thing. Because you are.
    There you go. First sentence proves my point.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    It's ok. At the time it was a legitimate choice for the stupid and/or deluded. Nothing to be ashamed about.

    What is disingenuous is the claim that you're not allowed to discuss these thing. Because you are.
    It's all part of the self-pitying vibe.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    Why did you feel it important to mention I was a Brexiter?
    It's ok. At the time it was a legitimate choice for the stupid and/or deluded. Nothing to be ashamed about.

    What is disingenuous is the claim that you're not allowed to discuss these thing. Because you are.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Issue concerning the changing demographics being discussed by two Brexiters. And look... no bans, no infractions.

    Oh.., apparently you can discuss it here. But if you use racist (etc.) tropes, language, dog whistles, terminology... , then no - that's not acceptable. Quick example. Instead of "religion of peace", use "Islam".

    Bloody gammon flakes with no sense of irony.
    Nat, that's a bit disingenuous. You don't have to ban someone to censor them. Why did you feel it important to mention I was a Brexiter?

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Instead of "religion of peace", use "Islam".
    Racist!!

    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Bloody gammon flakes with no sense of irony.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    I don't believe genocide against British people is happening. Demographics are changing and it always has, perhaps never as fast though. I do think there is an issue to talk about and its when communities change too fast or when stand alone communities are created and don't integrate with society. I also think that you can't discuss these issues without being called racists etc.
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Not on here you can't................unless you voted Remain, in which case heads tend to get buried in the sand.

    Issue concerning the changing demographics being discussed by two Brexiters. And look... no bans, no infractions.

    Oh.., apparently you can discuss it here. But if you use racist (etc.) tropes, language, dog whistles, terminology... , then no - that's not acceptable. Quick example. Instead of "religion of peace", use "Islam".

    Bloody gammon flakes with no sense of irony.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    I'm fine.

    I don't get "anxious" when highlighting inconsistency.

    HTH

    Just when spelling it.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    It sounds like you've had it real tough. Are you OK?
    I'm fine.

    I don't get "anxious" when highlighting inconsistency.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Not on here you can't................unless you voted Remain, in which case heads tend to get buried in the sand.

    It sounds like you've had it real tough. Are you OK?

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    I don't believe genocide against British people is happening. Demographics are changing and it always has, perhaps never as fast though. I do think there is an issue to talk about and its when communities change too fast or when stand alone communities are created and don't integrate with society. I also think that you can't discuss these issues without being called racists etc.
    Not on here you can't................unless you voted Remain, in which case heads tend to get buried in the sand.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by Lockhouse View Post
    "Article Two of the UN convention defines genocide as "any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group"

    We're so post-racist now - we're a million miles past discriminating against a black face. I sincerely believe there's a case to make that genocide is being carried out (according to UN Article Two) against the British people.
    I don't believe genocide against British people is happening. Demographics are changing and it always has, perhaps never as fast though. I do think there is an issue to talk about and its when communities change too fast or when stand alone communities are created and don't integrate with society. I also think that you can't discuss these issues without being called racists etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    I read it is "penetrated by the Pirate".
    how Freudian

    Leave a comment:


  • Goosefeather
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    I read it is "penetrated by the Pirate".
    Well, what happens at sea, stays at sea...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X