• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Democracy is a joke"

Collapse

  • GreenMirror
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    I've always wondered how proportional representation deals with constituencies and allowing people to access their MP's to present a constituent's problem and issues.
    They do what they do at the moment. Vote with their conscience. Why listen to those nasty constituent prolls?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    I've always wondered how proportional representation deals with constituencies and allowing people to access their MP's to present a constituent's problem and issues.
    Well as you maybe aware, every few years you can (could) vote in the European elections. In England, Scotland and Wales the voting system for the European elections is the d'Hondt system of proportional representation - regional closed list. In Northern Ireland the system is Single Transferable Vote.

    Since 1999 voters in Britain have elected MEPs under a proportional representation system. The European Parliamentary Elections Act of that year introduced a regional list system with seats allocated to parties in proportion to their share of the vote.

    If you pop over to the various websites of the EU, the political parties, the MEPS, etc. you'll find it explained quite well

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
    You mean strawberry blonde ??
    In this day and age I'm not actually sure if that his name not.

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    You've got some young ginger bell end that you are quite welcome to as well
    You mean strawberry blonde ??

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
    In Scotland you have a Constituency MSP and then regional list MSPs. Each constituency only has one constituency MSP (obviously). In terms of voting in parliament, they are of equal value.
    You've got some young ginger bell end that you are quite welcome to as well

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    I've always wondered how proportional representation deals with constituencies and allowing people to access their MP's to present a constituent's problem and issues.
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Multi member constituencies are a compromise to achieve more proportionality and local representation.
    In Scotland you have a Constituency MSP and then regional list MSPs. Each constituency only has one constituency MSP (obviously). In terms of voting in parliament, they are of equal value.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    I've always wondered how proportional representation deals with constituencies and allowing people to access their MP's to present a constituent's problem and issues.
    Multi member constituencies are a compromise to achieve more proportionality and local representation.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Yeh, a totally proportional representation system, not the fudge the Lib Dems proposed, would be good. Of course not all constituents could have an MP who represented their own views locally but think that's a lesser issue.

    An elected House of Lords too (but called something else) plus ditch the monarchy.
    I've always wondered how proportional representation deals with constituencies and allowing people to access their MP's to present a constituent's problem and issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by GreenMirror View Post
    And for CUK mods.
    You'll be lucky.

    They are either incapable and/or unwilling to even follow their own rules.

    Bunch of insecure dullards with double standards.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    not all constituents could have an MP who represented their own views locally
    You might argue that most people don't currently have that anyway, unless of course their views happen to be in perfect symmetry with the personal aspirations of their own particular elected charlatan.

    Leave a comment:


  • TwoWolves
    replied
    Plato's Republic is as true today as it ever was.

    Republic (Plato) - Wikipedia

    Just replace the priest class with the media and it's clear there is nothing new under the sun.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    Not for CUK mods, they have no power or ability to influence much apart from a bunch of socially inept, incompetent IT contractors.
    Still, I'd pay to watch. Not much mind. Probably a bitcoin.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    For CUK mods?
    Not for CUK mods, they have no power or ability to influence much apart from a bunch of socially inept, incompetent IT contractors.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    Im all for a hunger games type selection process. I figure if they can make it through the killing games then they have something about them.
    For CUK mods?

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Im all for a hunger games type selection process. I figure if they can make it through the killing games then they have something about them. I can't imagine the negotiations with the EU as being as farcical if our PM had killed several other politicians.

    Also, they should be allowed to carry a gun and have to protect themselves. This would cut down on police protection costs and again prove their metal.

    I believe Winston Churchill had to do something similar as a lad and look how he turned out.
    Last edited by woohoo; 30 January 2019, 15:09.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X