Originally posted by LondonManc
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Feminatsi wants cake and then some...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Feminatsi wants cake and then some..."
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Gibbon View Post20 years ago, when newly single I never had this problem, first time sex I always let the girl 'lead'. If I felt they were unsure, I would just leave it at that. If I was fully engorged, off to the bathroom for a wank, simples. If I was pissed beyond reason then sex wouldn't be happening.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mudskipper View PostThis happens so very, very rarely that it's practically a non issue.
The Eastenders storyline is that the girl got drunk, flirted with two guys and went to bed with one of them consensually. She went to sleep/passed out and when she came to, the other was on top of her. Assuming the facts of the case as presented to the viewers are correct, then that is rape even if she was snogging him earlier in the evening.
Even if 5% of rape claims are invented, that means 95% are not. And it's the guys you're worrying about??
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gibbon View PostMissed that, but yes. The other thing is I can't understand why a man would want sex with an unresponsive woman, personally its the lust in a womans eyes that floats my boat, dull and uninterested = uninterested Gibbon.
But I don't like strip clubs etc either.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostSo effectively what it says on Jog On's link. "An idea from one man in the business: Try not to be a jerk"
But I don't like strip clubs etc either.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gibbon View Post20 years ago, when newly single I never had this problem, first time sex I always let the girl 'lead'. If I felt they were unsure, I would just leave it at that. If I was fully engorged, off to the bathroom for a wank, simples. If I was pissed beyond reason then sex wouldn't be happening.
Leave a comment:
-
20 years ago, when newly single I never had this problem, first time sex I always let the girl 'lead'. If I felt they were unsure, I would just leave it at that. If I was fully engorged, off to the bathroom for a wank, simples. If I was pissed beyond reason then sex wouldn't be happening.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Zigenare View PostWhy do you think curtains were invented?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostThat’s the old slippery slope scenario isn’t it “we’re dangerously close to...”
If a person says no to a sex act, that should be taken to mean no. I realise that is an anathema to some of the lotharios on here, but it’s as simple as that. Do you disagree?
We’re not dangerously close to anything that can’t be sorted with a bit of self control.
Leave a comment:
-
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...en-at-all-cost
Wall Street Rule for the #MeToo Era: Avoid Women at All Cost
Across Wall Street, men are adopting controversial strategies for the #MeToo era and, in the process, making life even harder for women.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by IR35 Avoider View PostI'm not following the argument closely enough to understand in what scenario yes didn't mean consent, but reasonable belief of consent is a defence against a rape conviction, so even if yes didn't mean consent, if it can reasonably be interpreted as consent by the hearer, that's legally good enough.
depends who defines reasonable doesn't it?
As per the link it seems its being redefined.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostI think the problem is that it seems quite reasonably while "no means no" the converse is not true, "yes does not necessarily mean yes".
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: