Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
But whether they wanted it banned to get more to see it or not, the other side of the story is that it has got the message across about palm oil deforestation to people who might not have known, or who ignored it because it doesn’t impact them or suit the media sources they use.
I don't believe for one minute the whole thing wasn't intended to go this way. Iceland know full well what the rules, as if they didn't know it wouldn't make it past Clearcast.
1. Take an existing movie produced by Greenpeace, get permission to slap log on at the end.
2. Announce on Twitter it has been "banned" (not exactly true, just not approved by the industry regulator).
3. Wait for it to go viral and for social media outrage to go full swing.
4. Petition started, everyone talking about it.
5. National media picks up story about the campaign.
All I'm waiting for now is for Clearcast to suddenly decide that "on reflection, we've decided it would be OK to show the advert" and its shown on TV, Iceland are vindicated, frozen food for everyone!
Part of me thinks it's pretty unethical to blatantly take advantage of a worthy campaign for the sake of flogging a few frozen turkeys cheesecakes at Christmas and part of me can't help but admire them taking advantage of how easy it is to whip up social media into an outrage frenzy.
Somewhere in Iceland's marketing department the guy who came up with this campaign is laughing his head off at the amount of advertising budget he's saved them:
PS This Google search 'Iceland Christmas (ad or advert or advertisement)' generated over 9 million hits with the story prominently covered by the BBC, Sky, The Independent, Guardian etc etc.
It's political correctness gone mad both to produce and to ban it, followed by triggered snowflakery whining about the ban, whereupon the gammons have got furious about an unspecified element of the whole sorry tale.
And ultimately this has driven OG to post another piquant observation reminding us all how offended he feels by the whole affair. Like the big "blouse" he is.
I'm the narrator of the story. Which makes you the fat cretin dribbling on the floor of a Barnstaple 'Spoons
Leave a comment: