Originally posted by alreadypacked
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Dilbert
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Dilbert"
Collapse
-
Something like this?Originally posted by alreadypacked View PostWe need an emoji for that.
Leave a comment:
-
He did have a point.Originally posted by psychocandy View PostHad an interview once for a gig. Knew the bloke (IT manager) anyway so it was a done deal afterwards
BUt before it had to be rubber stamped by the new financial director. Then got told he wanted to speak to me.
First question - "so this is a lot of money, why should we pay you this much when its x times more than the permies get?".
Leave a comment:
-
Or who to hit with a hammer.Originally posted by Zigenare View Post£50 to hit it with the hammer, £1250 for knowing where to hit it with the hammer!
Leave a comment:
-
£50 to hit it with the hammer, £1250 for knowing where to hit it with the hammer!Originally posted by psychocandy View PostHad an interview once for a gig. Knew the bloke (IT manager) anyway so it was a done deal afterwards
BUt before it had to be rubber stamped by the new financial director. Then got told he wanted to speak to me.
First question - "so this is a lot of money, why should we pay you this much when its x times more than the permies get?". The IT manager just went redder and redder as the FD asked stupider and more rude questions. I knew it was then not going to happen.... and it was.
To this day, I still know the original fella and he still apologies for the actions of his FD.
Leave a comment:
-
Yet you couldn't explain about experience, risk taken, that it is a pre-tax figure, you have no holiday or sick pay, no training days, your pension has to come out of that figure, etc.?Originally posted by psychocandy View PostHad an interview once for a gig. Knew the bloke (IT manager) anyway so it was a done deal afterwards
BUt before it had to be rubber stamped by the new financial director. Then got told he wanted to speak to me.
First question - "so this is a lot of money, why should we pay you this much when its x times more than the permies get?". The IT manager just went redder and redder as the FD asked stupider and more rude questions. I knew it was then not going to happen.... and it was.
To this day, I still know the original fella and he still apologies for the actions of his FD.
AYCOTBAC (Don't answer that for him NLUK!!!)
Leave a comment:
-
Had an interview once for a gig. Knew the bloke (IT manager) anyway so it was a done deal afterwards
BUt before it had to be rubber stamped by the new financial director. Then got told he wanted to speak to me.
First question - "so this is a lot of money, why should we pay you this much when its x times more than the permies get?". The IT manager just went redder and redder as the FD asked stupider and more rude questions. I knew it was then not going to happen.... and it was.
To this day, I still know the original fella and he still apologies for the actions of his FD.
Leave a comment:
-
Reminds me when a client changed their procurement policy while I was mid contract so at renewal it had to be approved by a member of the board as it was over a certain value threshold that previously didn't exist.Originally posted by alreadypacked View PostClassic ...
The IT director requested a meeting with me and the team leader who was my 'handler' at the client, during which the director commented with surprise that I was getting paid so much. I had the feeling it was comparable to his salary and somehow I had been flying under his radar so far, so I said "that's before tax". He visibly relaxed, his position of dominance re-established.
Renewal was approved, apparently they did need me after all.
I suppose senior management may only usually look at the project cost when approving things so expect those lower down the chain to ensure value for money for individual resources. Keep your head down and don't arrive on site too flashy, you might dent someone's ego.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Jan 8 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Today 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Yesterday 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21



Leave a comment: