You may have heard about Dishonest Don's failing casino being bailed out by father Fred illegally purchasing gambling chips with no intent to gamble (what kind of businessman loses money on a casino? This turns out to be the tip of the iceberg ; the NY Times has conducted a major investigation into the various ways the daily liar's version of how he got rich, as the master dealmaker who broke free from his father’s “tiny” Brooklyn and Queens real estate operation and built a $10 billion empire to be just more self serving BS.
In fact
By age 3, he was earning $200,000 a year in today’s dollars from his father’s empire. He was a millionaire by age 8. In his 40s and 50s, he was receiving more than $5 million a year.
In Mr. Trump’s books and TV shows and on the campaign trail, a central trope of his self-mythology has been that, as he began building his own empire, the only financial help he got from his father was a $1 million loan. Not only that: “I had to pay him back with interest.”
In fact, The Times found, Fred Trump lent his son at least $60.7 million, or $140 million in today’s dollars. Much of it was never repaid, records show. [...] All told, The Times documented 295 distinct streams of revenue Fred Trump created over five decades to channel wealth to his son.
In Mr. Trump’s books and TV shows and on the campaign trail, a central trope of his self-mythology has been that, as he began building his own empire, the only financial help he got from his father was a $1 million loan. Not only that: “I had to pay him back with interest.”
In fact, The Times found, Fred Trump lent his son at least $60.7 million, or $140 million in today’s dollars. Much of it was never repaid, records show. [...] All told, The Times documented 295 distinct streams of revenue Fred Trump created over five decades to channel wealth to his son.
11 Takeaways From The Times’s Investigation Into Trump’s Wealth - The New York Times
Of course, the Donald could silence some of this criticism by publishing his tax returns, as every other modern president did. Equally obviously, he won't. The scary thing is that this is the new 'normal' - most of the comments to the NYT Editorial start ....'Is anyone surprised?'
Strange Times.
Leave a comment: