• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: CUK, the GOOD?

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "CUK, the GOOD?"

Collapse

  • oracleslave
    replied
    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    Didn't we used to have a thread of threads?
    We had a thread of norks too

    FG RIP

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    P.S. Could a mod change the title, meant to be a question mark not an exclamation.
    4. Helpful mods.

    Leave a comment:


  • greenlake
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    and norks

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Didn't we used to have a thread of threads?

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Me

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    Threads that do not involve the participation of sasguru.
    ah continuing the Clint theme :

    AssGuru the man with no brain.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    See, now that would be creepy. I used the end of a toilet brush.
    That is in the general vicinity of creepy, but probably not over the line. You might want a second opinion from, say, nlady

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    You mean sas was your hand-puppet, but you didn't actually have your hand up his bottom?

    Only a finger?
    See, now that would be creepy. I used the end of a toilet brush.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    Personally, I miss my little sassy, he was like my personal plaything. But not in a creepy way.
    You mean sas was your hand-puppet, but you didn't actually have your hand up his bottom?

    Only a finger?

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    Threads that do not involve the participation of sasguru.
    Personally, I miss my little sassy, he was like my personal plaything. But not in a creepy way.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Threads that do not involve the participation of sasguru.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    ahh yes i remember her.
    I had forgotten until you reminded me.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    those norks are very small. Remins me of ex-mrs-bp. Like 2 pancakes with peas on top.
    ahh yes i remember her.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    That's the spirit. If you could use the numbering system I started, for example 2. All posts prior to 2005. and norks
    those norks are very small. Remins me of ex-mrs-bp. Like 2 pancakes with peas on top.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    2. A place for IT groups to find people with similar issues before going to closed forums like TAA and BG.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X