• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Two heterosexual Irish men marry to avoid paying €50,000 inheritance tax on house"

Collapse

  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    ...Personally I believe inheritance tax should be 100% with no exemptions for trusts/estates. ...
    The fact that some people have misued their inheritance is irrelevant.

    I think even if you are generally against wealth flowing through the generations, it's a little more nuanced than that. With 100% inheritance tax, spouses who become widowed, and children who become orphaned lose their family home.

    If the idea of inheritance were to be abolished, it would need to be done in such a way that a the consequences of a tragic death are amelioarted.

    Anyway, it's easy to say inheritance is a bad thing when your ex-spouses own all your assets.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Why should it be? One being the carer of the other, it seems morally correct that neither should lose their home due to inheritance tax. Similarly with siblings who share a home. It's inheritane tax that is morally repugnant.
    Despite what most CUK posters believe, it is the duty of each individual to arrange their affairs to reduce their tax exposure through legal means.

    Personally I believe inheritance tax should be 100% with no exemptions for trusts/estates. It is often trotted out that young people need something to get them started. What about the children of poor people? What about the son of Ronnie Barker who used his windfall to indulge in child porn?

    Those who think inheritance tax should be set at less than 100% have f**ktards for children or believe in inequality.

    Personally I breed independents rather than dependents.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by meanttobeworking View Post
    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/t...-a3726611.html

    It’s interesting that nobody considers THIS to be morally repugnant tax evasion
    Why should it be? One being the carer of the other, it seems morally correct that neither should lose their home due to inheritance tax. Similarly with siblings who share a home. It's inheritane tax that is morally repugnant.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Maybe HMRC and myself should get married?

    They have certainly f**ked me enough times.....

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post
    don't marriages still have to be consumated?
    Non consumation id grounds for divorce.

    I heard of one man who found out his fiancee was cheating. He went through the ceremony. Then in his acceptance speech told everyone! Then got divorced on grounds of failure to consummate the marriage.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by meanttobeworking View Post
    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/t...-a3726611.html

    It’s interesting that nobody considers THIS to be morally repugnant tax evasion
    don't marriages still have to be consumated?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by meanttobeworking View Post
    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/t...-a3726611.html

    It’s interesting that nobody considers THIS to be morally repugnant tax evasion
    I thought the story was amusing.

    Also their marriage will last longer than some people's.....

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Maybe the Irish tax authorities will change the law retrospectively?

    Oh wait. Ireland is a civilized country.

    Leave a comment:


  • Two heterosexual Irish men marry to avoid paying €50,000 inheritance tax on house

    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/t...-a3726611.html

    It’s interesting that nobody considers THIS to be morally repugnant tax evasion

Working...
X