Originally posted by eek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "November Budget - Stop Public sector IR35 rules coming into the Private sector"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by eek View PostHardly the most subtle number plate...
Leave a comment:
-
I am a little bit out of the game with the new role. But I have a team looking at some different operating models which may pleasantly surprise you. I think we (SThree) have the benefit that the majority of our contractors in the U.K. are generally white collar and STEM.
I’ll think about how I can get your input and share our findings in a confidential way.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by contractorinatractor View PostIt really depends on the tractor in question. At the weekends I am awful for using a rented contract 1997 Lamborghini CRONO 574-70, which does not really have much of a roof. After a freak unexpected storm, whilst showing off to a young harlot whilst scavenging the remains of a purple potato field, I am never without a fully functioning strong golf man-brolly.
The larger tractor, permanent and not subject to IR35, is actually three times the power of the Lambo, plus has a cabin sheltered from the elements - but harlots see the Lambo badge, drop top hood, and assume the quality of my spuds is excelling even the most hardy farmhand rival. 70HP can have this effect for a gent.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Andy Hallett View Post
2) Permietractors who will go on the books or use umbrellas.
It really depends on the tractor in question. At the weekends I am awful for using a rented contract 1997 Lamborghini CRONO 574-70, which does not really have much of a roof. After a freak unexpected storm, whilst showing off to a young harlot whilst scavenging the remains of a purple potato field, I am never without a fully functioning strong golf man-brolly.
The larger tractor, permanent and not subject to IR35, is actually three times the power of the Lambo, plus has a cabin sheltered from the elements - but harlots see the Lambo badge, drop top hood, and assume the quality of my spuds is excelling even the most hardy farmhand rival. 70HP can have this effect for a gent.
Leave a comment:
-
The funny thing is that if agents and contractors actually worked together rather than working against each other both ends would make more money. Rather than all this "who blinks first" bs. On the flipside, contractors would also have to scope projects out properly, write proposals and properly tender for projects. In my opinion, that is the only way you can truly change the cycle; provide a different class of service, more akin to that of an MSP / consultancy.
It's either that or ditch the agents altogether, find a group of fellow skilled workers with complimentary skills and then pay for some lead generation to bring work in. Problem is a lot of that is even more short term and risky than what we do now, and over the long term if you were already billing 400-500 a day you wouldn't actually generate that much more revenue due to the amount of time you'd have inbetween projects.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostIs that an HMRC definition or yours?
Of course you are entitled to your opinion - however HMRC will have a different opinion. That both examples you give above are caught.
You remind me of 2 hitch-hikers in the woods who see a bear coming towards them. One puts on their trainers. The other points out he cannot outrun the bear. The guy with the trainers says he only has to outrun the other guy.
CUK is full of people whose only strategy is to throw others under a bus. And have a good laugh about it.
The bus is coming for you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bobspud View PostIt's not them that is deciding...
Its you.
Do you know your subject area?
Can you call the next wave of ideas and tech?
Can you articulate the good from the fad and tell the non technical clients?
Do you train yourself and invest in new equipment and tools to ride the wave of change?
This is what the professional looks like.
Compare that with:
Turning up wearing clean (enough) clothes is a goal...
I don't really do office politics I just sit in my chair and do whatever the client wants...
Im off to play footy/pub/gym at 5 and that will be the last I think about work
Hope my agent pays me on time
One of these will be heading to an umbrella company soon...
Of course you are entitled to your opinion - however HMRC will have a different opinion. That both examples you give above are caught.
You remind me of 2 hitch-hikers in the woods who see a bear coming towards them. One puts on their trainers. The other points out he cannot outrun the bear. The guy with the trainers says he only has to outrun the other guy.
CUK is full of people whose only strategy is to throw others under a bus. And have a good laugh about it.
The bus is coming for you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostWho decides who is a professional contractor and who is an amateur? Maybe when HMRC defines that we can move forward.
The thing is that HMRC believe EVERYONE is an amateur.
I saw an article this morning saying that in the budget small print are new rules allowing HMRC to take what money they want when they want it.
Its you.
Do you know your subject area?
Can you call the next wave of ideas and tech?
Can you articulate the good from the fad and tell the non technical clients?
Do you train yourself and invest in new equipment and tools to ride the wave of change?
This is what the professional looks like.
Compare that with:
Turning up wearing clean (enough) clothes is a goal...
I don't really do office politics I just sit in my chair and do whatever the client wants...
Im off to play footy/pub/gym at 5 and that will be the last I think about work
Hope my agent pays me on time
One of these will be heading to an umbrella company soon...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Andy Hallett View PostStill agree with you. The market should / will fragment into:
1) professional contractors, delivering services, taking risks (getting shafted and being paid late) without hiding behind pseudo employment protections.
2) Permietractors who will go on the books or use umbrellas.
Also please don’t just blame the agencies, look at the clients for using the tax and employment regime as a subsidy for their workforce.
I repeat, professional contractors should see 2018/9 as an opportunity.
The thing is that HMRC believe EVERYONE is an amateur.
I saw an article this morning saying that in the budget small print are new rules allowing HMRC to take what money they want when they want it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Andy Hallett View PostStill agree with you. The market should / will fragment into:
1) professional contractors, delivering services, taking risks (getting shafted and being paid late) without hiding behind pseudo employment protections.
2) Permietractors who will go on the books or use umbrellas.
Also please don’t just blame the agencies, look at the clients for using the tax and employment regime as a subsidy for their workforce.
I repeat, professional contractors should see 2018/9 as an opportunity.
The Professional IT guys need a new animal to help them. We can't use traditional agencies any more because they have more or less ruined the contractor's USP by telling the client that they supply staff that are contingent and so 550 a day is a going rate for an X and so on. (and the tax system is subsidising this)
The actual true rate for someone that is on 550 should really be around £7-900+ this covers full and proper taxation and allows for enough money to save for bench time and pay for expenses. Oh and a profit at the end.
I think we need a new model that focuses on front end sales as a service with a salesmen that can sell a solution and contractors paying for their sales function as a percentage of the sale and probably more bids work.
Contractors are going to need to get together as co-operatives to cover the work and much more business thinking will be needed.
This rolls back to the point you made about fragmentation of the market.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostAll great fun, but totally wrong.
We should be emphasising that we are suppliers of knowledge and skills, operating in the exact same way as any other business and engaged on a B2B basis, making all this tulip about "we're not employees" totally unnecessary. Even Andy Hallett agreed with me on that point.
Sadly it's the agencies that have got us into this position by selling us as temporary workers under their control. That is what needs to be broken.
1) professional contractors, delivering services, taking risks (getting shafted and being paid late) without hiding behind pseudo employment protections.
2) Permietractors who will go on the books or use umbrellas.
Also please don’t just blame the agencies, look at the clients for using the tax and employment regime as a subsidy for their workforce.
I repeat, professional contractors should see 2018/9 as an opportunity.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by willendure View PostFunny how we're all happy we dodged the IR35 bomb, so came away happy, when in reality we got more dividend tax. I think I see how that one was spun.
I know which I can live with.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors, seen Halifax’s 18-month fixed rate remortgage? Yesterday 09:59
- Contractors, don’t be fooled by HMRC Spotlight 67 on MSCs Dec 4 09:20
- HMRC warns IT consultants and others of 12 ‘payroll entities’ Dec 3 09:15
- How you think you look on LinkedIn vs what recruiters see Dec 2 09:00
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
Leave a comment: