what's to stop a licensed mini-cab driver using the Uber app?
I ask this as I got an Uber in Leeds recently, who's taxi license was issued in Rawtenstall. It was his license, not Uber's.
And apart from the fact that this will surely be overturned as it's a protectionist measure and we're not France.
-
Originally posted by Martin@AS Financial View Post
Never apologise. This is General.
Leave a comment:
-
Ah - apologies. Missed this one.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostLeave a comment:
-
Slow -Scourer got there firstOriginally posted by BrilloPad View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Uber London ban: Ride hailing app private hire licence will not be renewed
Taken from the Independent
Transport for London on Friday announced that it was not renewing Uber’s licence to operate in the city dealing a sharp blow to the ride hailing app, tens of thousands of UK-based drivers and a sprawling customer base.
In a damning statement, the transport authority said that its regulation of London's taxi and private hire trades is designed to ensure passenger safety.
Private hire operators must meet rigorous regulations and it said that it had concluded that Uber in London "is not fit and proper to hold a private hire operator licence".
TfL said that it considers that Uber's approach and conduct “demonstrate a lack of corporate responsibility in relation to a number of issues which have potential public safety and security implications”.
Its concerns relate to Uber’s approach to reporting serious criminal offences and its to how medical certificates are obtained, among other things.
The current licence expires on 30 September. Uber can appeal the decision within 21 days and will be able to continue to service its 3.5 million customers in London until that appeal process has been exhausted.
The California-based company, founded just over eight years ago, has been under intense fire from a growing army of critics in the UK, who claim that it is unfairly skewing competition and that it has not done enough to crack down on incidents of violence involving its drivers.
The Licensed Taxi Drivers Association, which has been one of the most vocal critics of Uber in London, praised Friday's decision and said that TfL had put public safety first.
“Since it first came onto our streets Uber has broken the law, exploited its drivers and refused to take responsibility for the safety of passengers,” Steve McNamara, the General Secretary of the LTDA said.
“We expect Uber will again embark on a spurious legal challenge against the Mayor and TfL, and we will urge the court to uphold this decision. This immoral company has no place on London’s streets”.
The GMB Union dubbed the move as a “historic victory”.
“As a result of sustained pressure from drivers and the public, Uber has suffered yet another defeat - losing its license to operate in London,” Maria Ludkin, GMB’s legal director said.
“No company can be behave like it's above the law, and that includes Uber. No doubt other major cities will be looking at this decision and considering Uber’s future on their own streets,” she added.
London is one of Uber's most established markets and Friday’s decision comes at a critical time for the group. It could embolden regulators in other countries to take a fiercer stand against the group. Uber is already battling a slew of legal cases and challenges in several US states and has been forced to quit countries including Denmark and Hungary.
In June, founder Travis Kananick resigned as from his role as chief executive officer in the face of shareholder outrage over company culture.
Dara Khosrowshahi, Uber’s new chief executive officer who joined from Expedia, is also juggling legal suits alleging the company stole self-driving technology from Google parent Alphabet. A bribery investigation is ongoing in Asia.
Responding to Friday’s decision, Tom Elvidge, general manager of Uber in London, said that drivers and clients would be “astounded”.
“By wanting to ban our app from the capital Transport for London and the Mayor have caved in to a small number of people who want to restrict consumer choice. If this decision stands, it will put more than 40,000 licensed drivers out of work and deprive Londoners of a convenient and affordable form of transport,” he said.
“To defend the livelihoods of all those drivers, and the consumer choice of millions of Londoners who use our app, we intend to immediately challenge this in the courts.”
He said that drivers who use Uber are licensed by TfL and have been through the same background checks as black cab drivers.
“We have always followed TfL rules on reporting serious incidents and have a dedicated team who work closely with the Metropolitan Police.”
He said that Uber operates in more than 600 cities around the world, including more than 40 towns and cities here in the UK. This ban, Mr Elvidge said, "would show the world that, far from being open, London is closed to innovative companies who bring choice to consumers”.
One of TfL's concerns relates to Uber's use of secret software known as "greyball". The company built it to avoid regulators. Uber on Friday said that "greyball" had never been used or considered in the UK for the purposes cited by TfL.
Within hours of the decision an online petition had been launched challenging the decision.
Dan Lewis, senior infrastructure adviser at the Institute of Directors, urged Uber to clarify how it will meet the standards outlined by the regulator but also demanded that TfL pay heed to London’s “hard-fought and positive reputation as a hotbed for disruptive innovation and tech-driven competition”.
“Regulatory hurdles should not be an insurmountable barrier to allowing consumers to use products if they find them useful,” he said. He also raised concerns about the human cost of the decision.
“TfL and Uber must come together to find a way through this because the bottom line is that competition driven by consumer choice is the cornerstone of the UK’s future economic success,” he said.
Leave a comment: