Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Yup everyone should study yurt building and beard shaping."
I'm not sure what's worse:
That the DM thinks their readership is so stupid that they can print outright lies in their headline and contradict them two paragraphs down;
or that the DM readership is so stupid that they don't notice the outright lies in the headline despite them being contradicted two paragraphs down
Perhaps before you criticise others, you might want to brush up on your own literacy skills.
It's clear from this thread that you can't read or are not interested in reading.
It's also clear that you can't write particularly well.
Has the Daily Mail told you that you should not read beyond headlines or think for yourself and you have worshipfully believed them?
Well clearly in that instance auto correct changed have to gave and I missed it.
Not really, another one of the Fails effort at misdirection with a dodgy headline.
What he actually said was
Which doesn't quite equate to the headline that no-one is interested in them and is actually challenging Goves plan to do away with arts, history, languages etc as part of the curriculum.
And it's one paragraph in a long article that mainly focusses on Brexit and options for the regions, emphasising that trying to do separate deals for Scotland, Wales and NI is going to be extremely difficult.
You'd almost think they were so desperate to find something to smear him with they, had to shoe horn it in at the start of an unrelated article in the hopes people wouldn't bother reading the rest of it.
The Mail is close to evil and always has been. There will always be a market for it.
Not really, another one of the Fails effort at misdirection with a dodgy headline.
What he actually said was
Originally posted by The Daily Mail
During his talk, Corbyn said: 'Don't believe in Michael Gove Victorian theory of education that only English, Maths and Science matter. Nobody here is only interested in those three subjects, so why should our children be?'
Which doesn't quite equate to the headline that no-one is interested in them and is actually challenging Goves plan to do away with arts, history, languages etc as part of the curriculum.
And it's one paragraph in a long article that mainly focusses on Brexit and options for the regions, emphasising that trying to do separate deals for Scotland, Wales and NI is going to be extremely difficult.
You'd almost think they were so desperate to find something to smear him with they, had to shoe horn it in at the start of an unrelated article in the hopes people wouldn't bother reading the rest of it.
However regardless of who said what the idea that it is acceptable for people over the age of ten to not gave basic numeracy and literacy skills is wrong.
Perhaps before you criticise others, you might want to brush up on your own literacy skills.
It's clear from this thread that you can't read or are not interested in reading.
It's also clear that you can't write particularly well.
Has the Daily Mail told you that you should not read beyond headlines or think for yourself and you have worshipfully believed them?
However regardless of who said what the idea that it is acceptable for people over the age of ten to not gave basic numeracy and literacy skills is wrong.
Corbyn did not say what you claimed he did, after you had swallowed your dose of Daily Mail nonsense. Still, useful additional confirmation that you're a cretin.
An excellent example of how media mislead people by misrepresenting what was actually said in order to create headlines that fit their own agenda.
You were mislead into believing that Corbyn actually said this - when he said no such thing. Please read beyond the headlines and make up your own mind.
LOL ain't nobody got time fo dat.
However regardless of who said what the idea that it is acceptable for people over the age of ten to not gave basic numeracy and literacy skills is wrong.
Leave a comment: