Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "religiously-aggravated public order offence? expressing religious beliefs?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostIf I had a shop and you stood shouting in front of it then I would be tempted to get my cricket bat* out from under the counter to move you on.
*As everyone plays cricket keeping my playing stuff under the counter is legit.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WordIsBond View PostSounds like the crowd yelled at them, too. So it's mutual. And I'm sure Mohammed, if he would only express his view, would say they are liars, too. It's mutual. And presumably most gays think these guys were being immoral in saying those things, so that's mutual, too.
So the crowd, Mohammed, and the gays in the crowd (if any) didn't get arrested, or get told to move on by the police. So sounds like an equitable judgment to me.
Why do we need laws against saying stupid things loudly, anyway? We send people to Westminster to say stupid things loudly for five years. Unless they are actually advocating violence, let them speak.
*As everyone plays cricket keeping my playing stuff under the counter is legit.
Leave a comment:
-
Sounds like the crowd yelled at them, too. So it's mutual. And I'm sure Mohammed, if he would only express his view, would say they are liars, too. It's mutual. And presumably most gays think these guys were being immoral in saying those things, so that's mutual, too.
So the crowd, Mohammed, and the gays in the crowd (if any) didn't get arrested, or get told to move on by the police. So sounds like an equitable judgment to me.
Why do we need laws against saying stupid things loudly, anyway? We send people to Westminster to say stupid things loudly for five years. Unless they are actually advocating violence, let them speak.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View PostPeople should be able to say what they think.
Leave a comment:
-
People should be able to say what they think but shouting it out in a public place is rather different.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
Leave a comment:
-
If they caused a nuisance to a trader by stopping customers come in, and annoying a load of people leading to a crowd to start chanting at them then it's public disorder regardless of what they were saying.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: