• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Who would win: Russia or Britain"

Collapse

  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    The only country that can really fight Russia is Afghanistan. Shame we did not learn from them.
    Viewpoint: Why we all need to watch Brad Pitt's film War Machine - BBC News

    Quite...

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Does it have any aeroplanes? All I read is that it is 'expected' to have by '2025'...
    It's designed to be part of the EU army. Other countries supply the planes.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    ...and Windows XP
    Does it have any aeroplanes? All I read is that it is 'expected' to have by '2025'...

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    indeed because I imagine googling the true offensive and defensive capabilities of the new carrier will obviously reveal all the facts....
    No you're right, they probably visited Q before launch

    Leave a comment:


  • Dark Black
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    I am pretty sure it will be fitted with those at least - if not some other things.....

    I am wondering about that warship/cargo ship crash - something seems very strange about it - the ocean is a big place!
    Yeah I thought that was a weird one, especially given the course data for the cargo ship which seems to show it doing a long u-turn back towards the warship.. sure there's more to it than they are letting on.

    Leave a comment:


  • Uncle Albert
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    "This is the transcript of an actual radio conversation between a US naval ship and Canadian authorities off the coast of Newfoundland in October 1995. The Radio conversation was released by the Chief of Naval Operations on Oct. 10, 1995.

    US Ship: Please divert your course 0.5 degrees to the south to avoid a collision.

    CND reply: Recommend you divert your course 15 degrees to the South to avoid a collision.

    US Ship: This is the Captain of a US Navy Ship. I say again, divert your course.

    CND reply: No. I say again, you divert YOUR course!

    US Ship: THIS IS THE AIRCRAFT CARRIER USS CORAL SEA*, WE ARE A LARGE WARSHIP OF THE US NAVY. DIVERT YOUR COURSE NOW!!

    CND reply: This is a lighthouse. Your call. "
    The Obstinate Lighthouse

    Falser than NLYUK's eyelashes.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Surprised the new carrier is not fitted with a close in weapons system like the 20mm Phalanx or sea wiz - really really not?

    Chin up... if the US fleet can't avoid a container vessel there's hope for us.

    US warship 'stayed on deadly collision course with cargo ship despite warnings'
    I am pretty sure it will be fitted with those at least - if not some other things.....

    I am wondering about that warship/cargo ship crash - something seems very strange about it - the ocean is a big place!

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    "This is the transcript of an actual radio conversation between a US naval ship and Canadian authorities off the coast of Newfoundland in October 1995. The Radio conversation was released by the Chief of Naval Operations on Oct. 10, 1995.

    US Ship: Please divert your course 0.5 degrees to the south to avoid a collision.

    CND reply: Recommend you divert your course 15 degrees to the South to avoid a collision.

    US Ship: This is the Captain of a US Navy Ship. I say again, divert your course.

    CND reply: No. I say again, you divert YOUR course!

    US Ship: THIS IS THE AIRCRAFT CARRIER USS CORAL SEA*, WE ARE A LARGE WARSHIP OF THE US NAVY. DIVERT YOUR COURSE NOW!!

    CND reply: This is a lighthouse. Your call. "

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Surprised the new carrier is not fitted with a close in weapons system like the 20mm Phalanx or sea wiz - really really not?

    Chin up... if the US fleet can't avoid a container vessel there's hope for us.

    US warship 'stayed on deadly collision course with cargo ship despite warnings'

    Leave a comment:


  • Pip in a Poke
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    indeed because I imagine googling the true offensive and defensive capabilities of the new carrier will obviously reveal all the facts....

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Feck me, really?
    SO it is completely vulnerable to any attack?
    We have a few support ships but if you look at what we have compared to the USA is sod all...

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    Aircraft Carriers are vehicles of a different era. We also built them without the support ships required to protect them so Russia is right...
    Feck me, really?
    SO it is completely vulnerable to any attack?

    Honestly is there anything we can do right?
    Seems like the Remainers have a better understanding of British capabilities than Brexiters.
    Last edited by sasguru; 29 June 2017, 12:51.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Russia mocks UK aircraft carrier as 'convenient target at sea'

    "The Russian official added: "It is in the interests of the British Royal Navy not to show off the 'beauty' of its aircraft carrier on the high seas any closer than a few hundred miles to its Russian 'distant relative'.
    Although the Admiral Kuznetsov dates back to the Soviet era, Moscow says its aircraft carrier can defend itself with an array of offensive and defensive weapons - unlike the British vessel which relies on escort ships for protection."

    Ouch
    ...and Windows XP

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    The only country that can really fight Russia is Afghanistan. Shame we did not learn from them.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X