Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Burning Injustices
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Burning Injustices"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostThe Prime Minister is a role not a person - if he does not know what the role is supposed to achieve can I suggest he googles it?
The person currently holding that role is Theresa May.
So had he asked 'What is the point of Theresa May?' it would have been better - but that would have just exposed what he was trying to do with whole slant of the interview - e.g. fire award aggressive questions made to make Boris look bad.
So the main question is - is asking award aggressive questions which you know is going to cause the interviewee problems for the sake of causing the interviewee problems great journalism or childish journalism?
The likes of Tony Blair knew how to deal with journalists regardless of whether they liked him or not, and whether he was prepared or not.
Boris stumbled by not admitting he had just seen the Queen's speech in full and saying how he trusted his Prime Minister.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostSo the main question is - is asking award aggressive questions which you know is going to cause the interviewee problems for the sake of causing the interviewee problems great journalism or childish journalism?
If it's done to people you agree with, it's childish and proof that the BBC are left wing.
So, take your pick.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View Post
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Lavrov
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostI disagree. I listened to it while driving.
Eddie was completely out of order. He fired constant precise questions, all with a negative slant which required interpretation of the queens speech to answer. It was obvious to start with Boris was not prepared having just walked over from the chamber.
Saying 'What is the point of the Prime Minister' numerous times just proves how bias the BBC is. Along with Kuensberg(sic) there is a complete bias left wing attack ion the Tories and I reckon it's because they feel emboldened that the license fee wont get cut.
The person currently holding that role is Theresa May.
So had he asked 'What is the point of Theresa May?' it would have been better - but that would have just exposed what he was trying to do with whole slant of the interview - e.g. fire award aggressive questions made to make Boris look bad.
So the main question is - is asking award aggressive questions which you know is going to cause the interviewee problems for the sake of causing the interviewee problems great journalism or childish journalism?
Leave a comment:
-
Apparently it's been confirmed that Boris was at the peak of health, and was happy that he was fully prepared for the interview.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostI disagree. I listened to it while driving.
Eddie was completely out of order. He fired constant precise questions, all with a negative slant which required interpretation of the queens speech to answer. It was obvious to start with Boris was not prepared having just walked over from the chamber.
Saying 'What is the point of the Prime Minister' numerous times just proves how bias the BBC is. Along with Kuensberg(sic) there is a complete bias left wing attack ion the Tories and I reckon it's because they feel emboldened that the license fee wont get cut.
All with a negative slant - check
Boris was not prepared - check
Excellent journalism IMHO
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostEddie was fantastic, never heard Boris so flustered! Loved the bit where you could hear him rustling papers.
Given May is dead woman walking, and there is no fit replacement, shows how vacuous and entirely useless the Tories are.
Any hope of a reasonable brexit negotiation have evaporated. My hope is that the EU offer the UK the EEA, and we take it, and we can just crack on with minimum drama.
Keep your powder dry Labour, this will be the last Tory government in a very long time...
Eddie was completely out of order. He fired constant precise questions, all with a negative slant which required interpretation of the queens speech to answer. It was obvious to start with Boris was not prepared having just walked over from the chamber.
Saying 'What is the point of the Prime Minister' numerous times just proves how bias the BBC is. Along with Kuensberg(sic) there is a complete bias left wing attack ion the Tories and I reckon it's because they feel emboldened that the license fee wont get cut.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostMy hope is that the EU offer the UK the EEA
"The EEA Agreement does not cover the following EU policies: common agriculture and fisheries policies (although the EEA Agreement contains provisions on trade in agricultural and fish products); customs union; common trade policy; common foreign and security policy; justice and home affairs (the EEA EFTA States are however part of the Schengen area); direct and indirect taxation; or economic and monetary union."
And so we have an Agriculture Bill, a a Fisheries Bill, a Customs Bill and a Trade Bill (along with Nuclear Safeguards Bill, Immigration Bill and a Sanctions Bill).
Leave a comment:
-
Burning Injustices
Eddie was fantastic, never heard Boris so flustered! Loved the bit where you could hear him rustling papers.
Given May is dead woman walking, and there is no fit replacement, shows how vacuous and entirely useless the Tories are.
Any hope of a reasonable brexit negotiation have evaporated. My hope is that the EU offer the UK the EEA, and we take it, and we can just crack on with minimum drama.
Keep your powder dry Labour, this will be the last Tory government in a very long time...
Leave a comment:
-
Burning Injustices
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Today 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
Leave a comment: