• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Do we need more (fire) armed police?"

Collapse

  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Unless someone else was shooting at you with a gun who weren't the police you would go down for murder, manslaughter or GBH as it would be unreasonable force.

    We aren't the USA....
    The terrorists last Saturday were not shooting at anyone, let alone police. They were not even attacking the police.

    They were endangering life though so police made good call.

    Sadly police shooting in the USA seems to be racist.

    Leave a comment:


  • diseasex
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    What's stopping you picking up a black market shooter?

    Plenty around
    I'm not criminal.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by diseasex View Post
    If it was , I'd already have it. *Just in case*
    What's stopping you picking up a black market shooter?

    Plenty around

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by diseasex View Post
    Yes but it's not allowed for self defense
    Unless someone else was shooting at you with a gun who weren't the police you would go down for murder, manslaughter or GBH as it would be unreasonable force.

    We aren't the USA....

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Originally posted by diseasex View Post
    If it was , I'd already have it. *Just in case*


    Leave a comment:


  • diseasex
    replied
    Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
    I'm aware of that Do you seriously think they should be ??
    If it was , I'd already have it. *Just in case*

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Originally posted by diseasex View Post
    Yes but it's not allowed for self defence
    I'm aware of that Do you seriously think they should be ??

    Leave a comment:


  • diseasex
    replied
    Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
    There are.
    Yes but it's not allowed for self defense

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Originally posted by diseasex View Post
    Nah I'd keep it stashed properly and only draw in case of emergency. Dude calm your tits. You don't need to agree with everything I say but I have right to have my own opinion just as you do.

    ...And there should be rigoristic tests before approval for gun is awarded.
    There are.

    Leave a comment:


  • oscarose
    replied
    Originally posted by diseasex View Post
    I have right to have my own opinion
    +1

    wdisxs

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Do we need more (fire) armed police?

    Originally posted by grabri View Post
    Agree. I don't think tasering a vest filled with explosives is going to have the desired effect.

    Wasn't Cressida Dick the commanding officer in the Jean-Charles de Menendes operation?
    They can carry both. A tazer and a sidearm (with rubber bullets). The elite counter terrorist lot can have full live rounds.


    Yellow handle of tazer:

    Leave a comment:


  • diseasex
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    If it stops him being shot by a Pole with a grudge, it was 10 seconds well spent. :
    Mass pole shootings. We hear that a lot. You guys should be grateful to me for being such a great immigrant that contributes and enriches your society so heavily

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Do we need more (fire) armed police?

    Originally posted by diseasex View Post
    Have you just wasted precious 10 sec of your life?
    If it stops him being shot by a Pole with a grudge, it was 10 seconds well spent. :

    Leave a comment:


  • diseasex
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    Would that include spelling and grammar?
    Have you just wasted precious 10 sec of your life?

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by diseasex View Post
    Nah I'd keep it stashed properly and only draw in case of emergency. Dude calm your tits. You don't need to agree with everything I say but I have right to have my own opinion just as you do.

    ...And there should be rigoristic tests before approval for gun is awarded.
    Would that include spelling and grammar?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X