Originally posted by vetran
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Maybe we should take a trick from them..."
Collapse
-
Love the idea women should earn less "because they're smaller"
There are loads of pro female chess players but they can't compete with the top men. I'm unsure if that's because the numbers are still weighted against them or because they are treated differently, or if there's a genuine physiological difference. It's discussed a fair bit on chess forums where most people are men which doesn't really further a useful debate.
Leave a comment:
-
Judit Polgar in No. 72 (peaked at No. 8 in 2005).Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostSeems like a very reliable bit of analysis
Leave a comment:
-
Just like a relationshipOriginally posted by vetran View Postnot a very nice man.
Surprised there aren't more great women chess players never thought of it before, its strategy & knowing your opponent so they should be really good at it.
Leave a comment:
-
not a very nice man.
Surprised there aren't more great women chess players never thought of it before, its strategy & knowing your opponent so they should be really good at it.
Leave a comment:
-
Seems like a very reliable bit of analysisOf course women must earn less than men because they are weaker, they are smaller, they are less intelligent, they must earn less, that’s all,” he said. “Do you know how many women are in the first 100 of chess players. I tell you, no one.
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe we should take a trick from them...
Next time a male MP barks while a female MP speaks or similar (or vice versa) then they should be suspended and have 30 days of their expenses not paid linkyTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Today 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Yesterday 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: