• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Data science and predictability of outcomes."

Collapse

  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    Did you do a postgrad stats course or something? All sorts of deterministic models make use of historical data to estimate their parameters without introducing any stochastic terms. As I said, it's a modelling choice. No idea what you're on about with regard to "similar event" or the time invariance of a stochastic process or "likelihood" w/r to a deterministic prediction. I think you're getting confused by stationarity or, perhaps, just in general. An event is simply a subset of a sample space. You don't need a "similar" event to make a prediction, you need a model, which may or may not have parameters to estimate from data.


    It's true some deterministic predictions may use of historical data. Typically not the case with myself, I would not depend on the results nor would my clients. In my industry accuracy is a prerequisite or I'll be sent packing back to Blighty. Probabilistic predictions offer far more utility using historical data than deterministic ever will.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Partly. It's also a pseudo-mindset and a pseudo-philosophy.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    Religion is pseudo-history.
    Partly. It's also a mindset and a philosophy.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Cretinism Creationism is a pseudoscience, but religion isn't.
    Religion is pseudo-history.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Or religion as it is otherwise known.
    Cretinism Creationism is a pseudoscience, but religion isn't.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Brexit was not predicted for two reasons

    1) There was no previous data which could be relied on to be used in predicting an outcome - the fact we joined the EEC in 1973 could not be used as it is to old.
    2) In clearly marginal cases such as brexit a sample poll of 2000 or even 10000 clearly did not scale up to the 17 million who actually voted.

    I have always been very wary of people who can 'predict' the outcome of anything - even if they have a lot of data to work with mainly because it is impossible to know the future.

    Of course we could all put data sets together saying that x is a more likely outcome than z assuming a,b,c etc do not happen

    In fact I think in todays fast moving market place 'pretending' you can do some science to predict the future is more harmful than accepting you only know what you know and gearing up your business to be able to react quickly.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    So, I work with people who spend more time telling you about their ability and qualifications on machine learning than making accurate predictions.

    I'm kind of going to say much of this is pseudo science.
    Or religion as it is otherwise known.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Because it's hard to predict crazy black-swan events?
    Since a crazy black-swan event is one that's hard to predict, that's fairly self evident. But thanks for sharing.

    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Why have our resident data scientists not predicted brexit?
    Any number of reasons. Perhaps they didn't apply their skills to it. Perhaps they didn't have access to the data. Perhaps the process is chaotic - so deterministic but not predictable (sensitive to very small changes in the initial conditions).

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    tea leaves got it wrong Scotland is still moaning
    FTFY.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Scooter is simply a thick fraud. Hth.
    oh dear the 'No brainers' are falling out. Next Darmy will be crying into his milk.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    Did you do a postgrad stats course or something? All sorts of deterministic models make use of historical data to estimate their parameters without introducing any stochastic terms. As I said, it's a modelling choice. No idea what you're on about with regard to "similar event" or the time invariance of a stochastic process or "likelihood" w/r to a deterministic prediction. I think you're getting confused by stationarity or, perhaps, just in general. An event is simply a subset of a sample space. You don't need a "similar" event to make a prediction, you need a model, which may or may not have parameters to estimate from data.
    Scooter is simply a thick fraud. Hth.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by greenlake View Post
    tea leaves got it wrong Scotland is still there

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Why have our resident data scientists not predicted brexit?
    What a dumb question.
    I think alcohol has addled your brain.

    Leave a comment:


  • greenlake
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Why have our resident data scientists not predicted brexit?
    Originally posted by teapot418 View Post
    I read tealeaves.

    Leave a comment:


  • GB9
    replied
    Originally posted by greenlake View Post
    Having recently worked with a genuine in-memory analytics tool, it does anything except speed things up!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X