Anyway, we digress.
What we need to ensure is that the squirrel-bothering oligarch is contributing enough into the collective pot to justify his continued presence in Blighty!
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: "Auto-enrolment"
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on ""Auto-enrolment""
Collapse
-
Originally posted by tomtomagain View PostCorrect. You don't know any of the detail about the product I've built, the risks I've taken or the R&D I've done so you are in no position to judge me.
Just because it is unusual, doesn't mean it's impossible and certainly does not mean that I have been deliberately unlawful.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostBut I don't really know the details so it's a sweeping assumption at best. I'm good at those apparently. You sound confident enough so surely I must be wrong.
Just because it is unusual, doesn't mean it's impossible and certainly does not mean that I have been deliberately unlawful.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tomtomagain View PostAre you implying that I have made a false claim?
But I don't really know the details so it's a sweeping assumption at best. I'm good at those apparently. You sound confident enough so surely I must be wrong.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostWouldn't falsely claiming R&D be evasion so not really something to be celebrated?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NigelJK View PostI did look at this years ago and hit many of the obstacles mentioned. So well done TTagain. Getting any money out the the Taxman should be celebrated.
Leave a comment:
-
I did look at this years ago and hit many of the obstacles mentioned. So well done TTagain. Getting any money out the the Taxman should be celebrated.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostGuess he better get a large tub of lube through under R&D quick then.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tomtomagain View PostWell I accurately described what I have done. Filled in the correct forms and submitted the information. HMRC reviewed and awarded the credits.
If you don't ask, you don't get.
It's important to maintain separate documentation for it - just because they don't ask does not mean they won't, I expect crackdown on RD in any next budget - they are reducing headline corp tax so will try to claw back creditsLast edited by AtW; 6 March 2017, 11:16.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostAnd you can put any old bollocks down on your expenses and get away with it as well. Doesn't make it right.
Or you can run your company properly, keep your records accurately, pay your taxes on time. I do.
Your ass on the line so if you think it's worth it then fill your boots.
I resent that line. "Filling My Boots". It's not like I put the money in my own back pocket. The refund has been put back into the company and with that and the fall in sterling ( I sell in USD ) I have been able to create a new job in the UK.
And surely the tax system is not only about collecting and redistributing money to pay for services and welfare but also about incentivising companies and supporting the development of new and growing businesses?
It is my ass on the line. Which is why it's done right. I have absolutely no qualms or concerns about what I submitted. As I said, I filled in everything that was asked of me accurately and produced a detailed 20 page document of supporting evidence. If HMRC wish to review the claim then I'd be more than happy to discuss it further.
At the end of the day all I can do is follow the rules. Which is what I did and the result was the R&D tax credits.Last edited by tomtomagain; 6 March 2017, 09:47.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tomtomagain View PostWell I accurately described what I have done. Filled in the correct forms and submitted the information. HMRC reviewed and awarded the credits.
If you don't ask, you don't get.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostThe details are in the word developed and linking that to some very clear guidelines from. HMRC noting this paragraph amongst others.
So the devil in the details of what you can created and if it had advanced knowledge. I doubt due the number of people that come.on asking if what they've developed is R&D and its not. It's just a useful app that doesn't advance anything
I don't know what you've created so it's your call.
If you don't ask, you don't get.
Leave a comment:
-
Guess he better get a large tub of lube through under R&D quick then.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by tomtomagain View PostHave you claimed R&D tax credits? If not, then you can claim for the last two years. The form is easy enough to fill in. I managed to get back 50% of my CT for the last two years.
We do claim some experimental work, but majority of stuff won't qualify - R&D tax credits and Patent Box stuff were designed to benefit some particular large companies that we are not.
It's easier just to sell all export sales via foreign subsidiary in a zero corp tax zone - totally legal as UK revenues will be booked in UK, something that will be even more attractive if new trade barriers will appear.
P.S The Govt can shove those complicated tax credits up its rectumLast edited by AtW; 6 March 2017, 02:18.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Leave a comment: