Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "In what language is this NOT a threat"
At some point your children will grow older and become adults. As an individual they'll be mature enough to understand the position you're now facing today. At that time they'll appreciate the time you devoted to them, the time you spent with them, rather than the assets you purchased.
Not if they grow into money grabbing adults like her.
At some point your children will grow older and become adults. As an individual they'll be mature enough to understand the position you're now facing today. At that time they'll appreciate the time you devoted to them, the time you spent with them, rather than the assets you purchased.
I agree but she claims no-one will rent to her as she is not working - of course this is rubbish but it took her more than a year to find a proper rental in the meantime she was in a B&B. Oh and don't forget the Thatcher generation "ownership" is "better".
Only because she must have been determined to live in a very specific area as there are landlords about who want long term tenants like your wife.
Another reason not to buy her a property for the kids is that you presume she is going to shack up or remarry - poor person - and then she will be tied to the property in a particular which will cause her difficulties in her new relationship. If she and the other person decides to buy a house together you will still be giving her a similar amount of money until the kids are move out to live with you or become 18.
Yup no perjury so no basis for the court to approve a freezing order, hence it is just a threat. Strangely she is talking to a no win no fee shark so I don't know what lies she has told them.
The no-win no-fee shark will do their investigations and when they realise you aren't as rich as what she is making out will drop the case.
I can open my accounts to whoever a court approves but her issue is going to be about hidden money I suspect - but I don't have any hidden money.
Mediation on what - to offer to pay more than I had to under the already finalised court order?
the news about seeing someone else did come out unexpectly about 2 months ago.
I agree but she claims no-one will rent to her as she is not working - of course this is rubbish but it took her more than a year to find a proper rental in the meantime she was in a B&B. Oh and don't forget the Thatcher generation "ownership" is "better".
Yup no perjury so no basis for the court to approve a freezing order, hence it is just a threat. Strangely she is talking to a no win no fee shark so I don't know what lies she has told them.
I am already :
Point is to offer a reasonable solution and ask her to make an accusation that you can prove untrue.
Its all nasty. friends & relatives have been through similar but most times the kids figure out who was unreasonable when they get older. Most I know have turned out alright where their parent showed they loved them.
He needs his head examined if he's going to buy her a property to live in. There is nothing wrong with them living in rental accommodation until she sorts out her job prospects and if she never sorts them out it's her own tough luck.
He's better of sorting out his affairs so if the kids choose they can come and live with him.
I agree but she claims no-one will rent to her as she is not working - of course this is rubbish but it took her more than a year to find a proper rental in the meantime she was in a B&B. Oh and don't forget the Thatcher generation "ownership" is "better".
+1 to Vetran, also point out that you have the court documents and if she believes you committed perjury (you didn't did you?) then go ahead. She won't get a legal aid solicitor for that claim and there's not a no-win no-fee shark that would take it either. You have paid/are paying your dues and should have sufficient access to your children to ensure they are being looked after properly (with your maintenance).
Yup no perjury so no basis for the court to approve a freezing order, hence it is just a threat. Strangely she is talking to a no win no fee shark so I don't know what lies she has told them.
+1 to Vetran, also point out that you have the court documents and if she believes you committed perjury (you didn't did you?) then go ahead. She won't get a legal aid solicitor for that claim and there's not a no-win no-fee shark that would take it either. You have paid/are paying your dues and should have sufficient access to your children to ensure they are being looked after properly (with your maintenance).
Claim for perjury? That's a criminal offence reported to police, tried in courts for perhaps a 1 to 2 stretch.
He's better of sorting out his affairs so if the kids choose they can come and live with him.
Bang on the money there.
+1 to Vetran, also point out that you have the court documents and if she believes you committed perjury (you didn't did you?) then go ahead. She won't get a legal aid solicitor for that claim and there's not a no-win no-fee shark that would take it either. You have paid/are paying your dues and should have sufficient access to your children to ensure they are being looked after properly (with your maintenance).
Sheesh, these horror stories about divorce settlements are beyond belief.
Seems like one lesson from the above discussion is that any payments conceded as part of a final settlement for a specific purpose, such as buying a house, should be paid into an escrow account and withdrawable from there only for the agreed purpose at the time this is put into effect.
Just paying the partner (usually the ex-wife) up front for some planned future purchase is madness if they can simply piss it up the wall and then come back demanding another bite of the cherry.
Leave a comment: