• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "How purchasing departments work, part 94."

Collapse

  • original PM
    replied
    Purchasing departments like exist due to sheer stupidity.

    Someone has built an empire and is defending it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by greenlake View Post
    ....or, for the same price, twice as much of something similar....

    Kat, yummy

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by greenlake View Post
    ....or, for the same price, twice as much of something similar....

    Same quality vs cost decision as in NLyUK's line of business. Coincidence?

    Leave a comment:


  • greenlake
    replied
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    I'd have gone with kit-kats too.
    ....or, for the same price, twice as much of something similar....

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    Chunky two fingers then.

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    Do you prefer two or four fingers?

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    Penny pinching losers. Without hookers to dispense the coke I'd have gone with kit-kats too.
    Do you prefer two or four fingers?

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    The office I was in kept the kit-kats everywhere else kept the Coke.
    Penny pinching losers. Without hookers to dispense the coke I'd have gone with kit-kats too.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    I'm currently rewriting some code as end client can't push through the $500 a month for a box required for a PoC and nor can I face the internal pain if I ask for the box internally.

    the fact that I understand the old school approach and haven't used the other approach in 2+ years is neither here nor there.

    A previous clientco used to offer both free kit-kats and coke. Offices were then asked to make a decision which to keep. The office I was in kept the kit-kats everywhere else kept the Coke.

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Cool story bro.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Sounds like an EU diktat to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    The admin ladies at clientco used to take the company credit card to the local supermarket to buy fruit for the ~40 people in the offices. £30 per week budget. This has now been stopped by the purchasing department, who say the company credit card mustn't be used in this way, and that fruit must be bought from one of the approved catering suppliers. They charge considerably more for each fruit item than the local supermarket does, in addition to a fixed fee of £10. That means we'd get now about 10 apples between us.

    This is not value for money, so the fruit budget has been abolished.

    Obv. this doesn't affect rich contractors, but it is a fine example of corporate idiocy. What's odd is that the CIO and his team are part of this office, and were the ones who instigated the fruit bowls. But even they don't have the power to go against purchasing...
    If this happened in the public sector, it would be seen as an example of public sector wastage. Really, it's just big organisation wastage. Made me smile so thanks for sharing.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    started a topic How purchasing departments work, part 94.

    How purchasing departments work, part 94.

    The admin ladies at clientco used to take the company credit card to the local supermarket to buy fruit for the ~40 people in the offices. £30 per week budget. This has now been stopped by the purchasing department, who say the company credit card mustn't be used in this way, and that fruit must be bought from one of the approved catering suppliers. They charge considerably more for each fruit item than the local supermarket does, in addition to a fixed fee of £10. That means we'd get now about 10 apples between us.

    This is not value for money, so the fruit budget has been abolished.

    Obv. this doesn't affect rich contractors, but it is a fine example of corporate idiocy. What's odd is that the CIO and his team are part of this office, and were the ones who instigated the fruit bowls. But even they don't have the power to go against purchasing...

Working...
X