• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Hmm Chlorinated chicken anyone ?"

Collapse

  • tomtomagain
    replied
    Funny stuff food.

    It's all genetically modified anyway. Carrots used to be purple until the Dutch started messing around with them.

    Where do you find a wild herd of Friesian cows?

    Wheat? That's just grass with a genetic defect.

    Dogs are genetically modified wolves.

    Nice big juicy strawberry? Funny the wild ones are tiny. It wasn't until the late 18th century that they became domesticated.

    And did you know that a modern hen will lay around 300 eggs a year? Back in the 50's they only laid 100.

    Most foods have been losing their nutritional value ( and taste ) over the last 100 years or so driven by a desire to make them bigger and prettier.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    In general I see no problem with GM. It goes wrong in two ways IMO:

    - Firstly, when it removes the control of seeds from farmers and their cooperative organisations and puts it into the grasp of multinational corporations

    ...
    Another potential problem is cross-contamination of GM crop genetic mods into wild plants, which will happen however much they claim it can't.

    If a mod to limit the number of fertile seed generations crossed into grass for example or marine phytoplankton and spread, we'd all be in the tulip big time along with all animal life on Earth.

    Leave a comment:


  • The_Equalizer
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    The bit that's almost smoking is trout. The chicken & trout combo sounds tempting, but I may try it on the cat first.
    According to Captain Beefheart it's actually a carp.



    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    Smoked trout stuffed chicken on a bed of cat? Even the old man would turn up his nose at that!

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    The bit that's almost smoking is trout. The chicken & trout combo sounds tempting, but I may try it on the cat first.
    Smoked trout stuffed chicken on a bed of cat? Even the old man would turn up his nose at that!

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    If you keep letting the population increase then sooner or later food quality takes a dive, assuming there's even enough of the stuff.

    This country is now only 40% self-sufficient in essential foods, and that percentage is falling all the time.
    Expel MF, Shauny and Suity and it rises to 55%

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    This country is now only 40% self-sufficient in essential foods, and that percentage is falling all the time.
    You want to try Sainsbury's mate, they have 100% of everything I need.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by The_Equalizer View Post
    That's not a trout, it's a chicken!
    The bit that's almost smoking is trout. The chicken & trout combo sounds tempting, but I may try it on the cat first.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    In general I see no problem with GM. It goes wrong in two ways IMO:

    - Firstly, when it removes the control of seeds from farmers and their cooperative organisations and puts it into the grasp of multinational corporations
    Entirely true.
    - Secondly, some of the weird experimental tulip, like when they combined the genetic code of a sea cucumber with a Scotsman to see if the result would be capable of holding down an IT contracting career in Devon. Very sad to see.


    And here we have a spreader of the aforementioned fear and ignorance.
    Originally posted by sal View Post
    Blanket ban on GM > than relying on some bureaucrat to differentiate between "good" and "bad" GM. If you believe the huge US corporations are pushing GMs to feed the world's hungry, rather than for increased profits at all cost you have to get off the kool aid
    Logical fallacy: non-sequitur. Why? From the proposition that "corporations push their GMOs for commercial advantage" it does not follow that "GMOs are bad."

    Under your logic, the product of any company that indulges in bad practice and is driven by the profit motive should be banned, and we should also immediately ban all food additives because whether they're good or bad depends on the ability of "some bureaucrat to differentiate between "good" and "bad"" additives.

    Leave a comment:


  • The_Equalizer
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    If you keep letting the population increase then sooner or later food quality takes a dive, assuming there's even enough of the stuff.

    This country is now only 40% self-sufficient in essential foods, and that percentage is falling all the time.
    If we accepted cannibalism it might just rise to 50%, or would that be 100%?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    https://www.theguardian.com/environm...ules?CMP=fb_gu

    Anyone for chlorinated chicken and gm foods ?

    Post Brexit you can have as much as you can eat

    Milan
    If you keep letting the population increase then sooner or later food quality takes a dive, assuming there's even enough of the stuff.

    This country is now only 40% self-sufficient in essential foods, and that percentage is falling all the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    In general I see no problem with GM. It goes wrong in two ways IMO:

    - Firstly, when it removes the control of seeds from farmers and their cooperative organisations and puts it into the grasp of multinational corporations
    - Secondly, some of the weird experimental tulip, like when they combined the genetic code of a sea cucumber with a Scotsman to see if the result would be capable of holding down an IT contracting career in Devon. Very sad to see.[/LIST]
    The goats with spider genes and silk in their milk
    Prof Randy Lewis shows Adam Rutherford genetically modified goats at a farm at Utah State University, US, which produce large quantities of a spider silk that is among the strongest substances known to man.
    The transplanted gene means the goat produce milk containing an extra protein, which is extracted and spun into spider silk thread
    The goats with spider genes and silk in their milk - BBC News

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by sal View Post
    Blanket ban on GM > than relying on some bureaucrat to differentiate between "good" and "bad" GM.
    How about we rely on scientists rather than bureacrats. Deal

    Originally posted by sal View Post
    If you believe the huge US corporations are pushing GMs to feed the world's hungry, rather than for increased profits at all cost you have to get off the kool aid
    If you believe farmers are grwoing food to feed the world's hungry, rather than for increased profits at all cost you have to get off the kool aid (and presumably grwo your own food because your motive will be pure).

    Leave a comment:


  • sal
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    GM covers a huge range. The anti-GM sentiment of the general public is based upon fear and ignorance.

    Here's some good GM, that saves life: The Golden Rice Project

    Chlorinated chicken/acid washed pork? If the abattoirs are up to standard, are there other reasons these should be banned?

    Antibiotics, hormones, additives, pesticides and mad-cow disease practices are more problematic.
    Blanket ban on GM > than relying on some bureaucrat to differentiate between "good" and "bad" GM. If you believe the huge US corporations are pushing GMs to feed the world's hungry, rather than for increased profits at all cost you have to get off the kool aid

    abattoirs are going for the path of least resistance/cost - if they can use chlorine/acid instead of expensive building/equipment - they will do it.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by The_Equalizer View Post
    That's not a trout, it's a Tricken!
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X