Reply to: Theresa May fails to condemn Donald Trump on refugees

[NotAllThere]

...

2/ Would there have been an outcry or support if he had instead banned Saudi Arabia and Pakistan instead, given that they have been proved to be promoting Wahhabism, the more virulent and hate-fuelled brand of Islam?

Saudi - definitely support.

[LondonManc]

Two points on this that seem to have been missed:

1/ Obama bombed six of the seven countries that Trump blocked

2/ Would there have been an outcry or support if he had instead banned Saudi Arabia and Pakistan instead, given that they have been proved to be promoting Wahhabism, the more virulent and hate-fuelled brand of Islam?

[BrilloPad]

Trump is nothing relative to Saudi and China. It is not up to the UK to be the world policeman.

[PurpleGorilla]

How about not doing Brexit? Then we won't have to cosy up to crazies like Trump, she should put on referendum her current "whitepaper" and only proceed if 2/3 vote for it

You think we can stuff it back in the box and pretend the referendum never happened?

[shaunbhoy]

...and you said NO.

:
:
:

The only possible way to GET the best possible deal was to say NO to staying within a restrictive profligate anachronism that prevented this.

Obviously too complex a point for a simpleton like you to have grasped.

Not the first time though.

HTH

[WTFH]

Theresa May fails to condemn Donald Trump on refugees

The Referendum was about our leadership getting the best possible deal for the country.

...and you said NO.

:
:
:

[shaunbhoy]

I see. So the question in the referendum was actually "Should the PM condemn the actions of a sexist, misogynistic, racist US President?".

The Referendum was about our leadership getting the best possible deal for the country. Part of that will quite possibly hinge on getting, and staying, on the right side of Trump, love him or loathe him.

This she seems to be doing in her own quiet way, and as long as she continues in that vein then she will have my blessing.

She has said quite enough about the fact that we view some of his "methods" and "techniques" differently. No sense in overegging things however.
Gently gently catchee monkey.

I think your blind hatred of scooterscot and all he stands for and says is tripping up your logical thought processes. You'd probably be healthier putting him on ignore

Oh I don't hate scooterscot in the slightest. I look forward to his contributions with relish. A bit like awaiting the next episode of Blackadder.

[AtW]

It's a bit unfair to attack May for not being critical of Trump's immigration policy. Let's face it, with Brexit, we are going to need all the 'Friends' we can get. If we could cuddle up with Stalin to defeat the Nazis, then making good with the 'Grabber in Chief' is really small fry.

How about not doing Brexit? Then we won't have to cosy up to crazies like Trump, she should put on referendum her current "whitepaper" and only proceed if 2/3 vote for it

[NotAllThere]

Why the part of "does not agree" is between brackets?

It's not between brackets, it's in quotation marks, because it is a direct quote.

[scooterscot]

It's a bit unfair to attack May for not being critical of Trump's immigration policy. Let's face it, with Brexit, we are going to need all the 'Friends' we can get. If we could cuddle up with Stalin to defeat the Nazis, then making good with the 'Grabber in Chief' is really small fry.

I wonder when many people will question such a point against the awful time we had being a member of the EU.

[Bee]

Theresa May has issued a late-night statement saying she “does not agree” with Donald Trump’s ban on refugees and people from seven Muslim-majority countries entering the US, after coming under intense political pressure to condemn the order.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...e_iOSApp_Other

Why the part of "does not agree" is between brackets?

[scooterscot]

I see. So the question in the referendum was actually "Should the PM condemn the actions of a sexist, misogynistic, racist US President?".

I think your blind hatred of scooterscot and all he stands for and says is tripping up your logical thought processes. You'd probably be healthier putting him on ignore

Hold the phone. SB has a logical thought process?

[sirja]

It's a bit unfair to attack May for not being critical of Trump's immigration policy. Let's face it, with Brexit, we are going to need all the 'Friends' we can get. If we could cuddle up with Stalin to defeat the Nazis, then making good with the 'Grabber in Chief' is really small fry.

[PurpleGorilla]

Theresa May fails to condemn Donald Trump on refugees

Theresa May has issued a late-night statement saying she “does not agree” with Donald Trump’s ban on refugees and people from seven Muslim-majority countries entering the US, after coming under intense political pressure to condemn the order.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...e_iOSApp_Other

[NotAllThere]

Heard it here first. Our PM is acting in the best interests for the people of Britain by showing support to a sexist misogynistic racist.

May's fault is that she is trying to act upon the democratically expressed wishes of a majority of her electorate

ftfy

I see. So the question in the referendum was actually "Should the PM condemn the actions of a sexist, misogynistic, racist US President?".

I think your blind hatred of scooterscot and all he stands for and says is tripping up your logical thought processes. You'd probably be healthier putting him on ignore