Originally posted by Paddy
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Missing Persons
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Missing Persons"
Collapse
-
So to summarise, if these "prerogative" powers are removed and handed over to parliament, the government can't so much as fart without putting it before parliament first?
-
The court case is all about Royal Prerogative that May believes she has, it is not confined to Brexit.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostIn what way has vetran missed the point?
Sounded to me like a good summary of the situation.
Part of the argument this afternoon
The government lawyer repeats his view that domestic UK rights are "susceptible to change at an EU level by exercise of government action", saying that to use a more "emotive" phrase, these rights can be "destroyed".
He says, in theory, 99.9% of domestic rights could be removed under the UK's prerogative powers. Lord Mance takes issue with this, saying the chance of the Council of Ministers and European Commission agreeing to this is "rather remote" and that the UK would probably find itself being outvoted.
He makes an interesting analogy, saying a distinction must be drawn about members of a club having to comply with changes in dress code and members either being expelled or giving notice of their intention to leave.
Leave a comment:
-
Because parliament do not care about what the majority of people want.Originally posted by vetran View Postwhy would you campaign against parliament having control of our destiny ? its sort of what the whole thing is about.
I suppose if it is as most believe is a back door attempt to derail brexit then that will need to be protested against. We aren't there yet.
However I suspect the judges will say yep Parliament need to vote, no they don't need to disclose strategy.
All that's happening is that some hairdresser & other hangers on are splurging millions of pounds of our money hoping to overturn the referendum result because she thinks that she knows better.
Leave a comment:
-
Brexit court case: Who is Gina Miller? - BBC NewsOriginally posted by OwlHoot View PostI see what you did there
Ms Miller launched the Brexit legal case along with London-based Spanish hairdresser Deir Dos Santos and the People's Challenge group, set up by Grahame Pigney and backed by a crowd-funding campaign.Last edited by vetran; 5 December 2016, 15:34.
Leave a comment:
-
You have missed point entirelyOriginally posted by vetran View Postwhy would you campaign against parliament having control of our destiny ? its sort of what the whole thing is about.
I suppose if it is as most believe is a back door attempt to derail brexit then that will need to be protested against. We aren't there yet.
However I suspect the judges will say yep Parliament need to vote, no they don't need to disclose strategy.
All that's happening is that some hairdresser & other hangers on are splurging millions of pounds of our money hoping to overturn the referendum result because she thinks that she knows better.
Leave a comment:
-
why would you campaign against parliament having control of our destiny ? its sort of what the whole thing is about.
I suppose if it is as most believe is a back door attempt to derail brexit then that will need to be protested against. We aren't there yet.
However I suspect the judges will say yep Parliament need to vote, no they don't need to disclose strategy.
All that's happening is that some hairdresser & other hangers on are splurging millions of pounds of our money hoping to overturn the referendum result because she thinks that she knows better.
Leave a comment:
-
Apparently he cancelled it because he likes having the support of neo Nazis, but doesn't actually enjoy their company
Nothing to do with the fact that about twenty people would have turned up and he'd have looked even more of an utter cock than usual, no, certainly not that
Leave a comment:
-
Missing Persons
Missing Persons
Nigel Farage is missing 100,000 protestors who were supposed to protest outside the Supreme Court today. If found; please give them directions.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Leave a comment: