• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Amy Lame - Inside or outside IR35?"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    if she is truly paying no income tax it does stink.

    He hasn't proved that as far as I can see.

    Though in light of the changes to government contractors surely a FTC is a better choice for engaging her if she is only providing her own labour.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post
    How very, er... Lame

    Leave a comment:


  • sal
    replied
    Originally posted by missinggreenfields View Post
    Who knows whether she is inside or outside for that particular contract? Without knowing all the details, it's more lazy reporting that anyone who uses a limited company MUST be doing so to avoid tax. Without seeing the company return, there's no detail about whether she pays PAYE at all, or even whether there is any income tax due for that contract.

    Reporting like this doesn't help the legitimate contractor at all.
    No they aim to bash at someone for using ltd. without knowing all the details. Same as what the lady in question is doing as part of the job in question...

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Ask your accountant.

    NLUK

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy
    Who cares ... she actually changed her surname to Lame? Lol **** me ...
    Guido Fawkes was born a stains. Though he changed his first name to Paul. Who wants to be called Seamen?

    Leave a comment:


  • bobspud
    replied
    Originally posted by missinggreenfields View Post
    Who knows whether she is inside or outside for that particular contract? Without knowing all the details, it's more lazy reporting that anyone who uses a limited company MUST be doing so to avoid tax. Without seeing the company return, there's no detail about whether she pays PAYE at all, or even whether there is any income tax due for that contract.

    Reporting like this doesn't help the legitimate contractor at all.
    And has probably been written by an idiot that is in the same position as her.

    Leave a comment:


  • missinggreenfields
    replied
    Who knows whether she is inside or outside for that particular contract? Without knowing all the details, it's more lazy reporting that anyone who uses a limited company MUST be doing so to avoid tax. Without seeing the company return, there's no detail about whether she pays PAYE at all, or even whether there is any income tax due for that contract.

    Reporting like this doesn't help the legitimate contractor at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    oh dear as some posters said - how very Labour

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    started a topic Amy Lame - Inside or outside IR35?

    Amy Lame - Inside or outside IR35?

    Is she or not?
    And after April?

    Khan's Troll Aide Paid Via Company, Pays No Income Tax - Guido Fawkes Guido Fawkes

Working...
X