• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Chuck Yeager

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Chuck Yeager"

Collapse

  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Given that he was talking primarily about his experiences in this country during World War II, any Poles he met were more likely to be flying Spitfires than working in hotels.
    He did actually say he had visited a "few" years ago, so that does suggest a time more recent.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Just a thought, but if he stayed in a hotel in London, the chances of him actually meeting any British people are extremely slim. The staff will all have been Polish, the guests will have been Russian, and if he used an Uber, their drivers are all banned from speaking English. No wonder London voted to remoan, there are hardly any British folk left here.
    Given that he was talking primarily about his experiences in this country during World War II, any Poles he met were more likely to be flying Spitfires than working in hotels.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Just a thought, but if he stayed in a hotel in London, the chances of him actually meeting any British people are extremely slim. The staff will all have been Polish, the guests will have been Russian, and if he used an Uber, their drivers are all banned from speaking English. No wonder London voted to remoan, there are hardly any British folk left here.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    I follow Yeager and saw the tweets in question. He's an irascible old sod who gives everybody short shrift, which is one of the things that makes him entertaining to follow. If anybody's offended by what he said, they're at liberty not to go to the trouble of following him and reading what he tweets
    If that was the only criteria, several characters here would get lauded. Instead of the banning they rightfully deserved.....

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    He is just over compensating for his repressed homosexuality.
    Probably due to come back to the fore to mark the 30th anniversary of Top Gun....

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Indeed more of a man than most of us put together.
    He is just over compensating for his repressed homosexuality.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    I follow Yeager and saw the tweets in question. He's an irascible old sod who gives everybody short shrift, which is one of the things that makes him entertaining to follow. If anybody's offended by what he said, they're at liberty not to go to the trouble of following him and reading what he tweets
    Indeed more of a man than most of us put together.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    I follow Yeager and saw the tweets in question. He's an irascible old sod who gives everybody short shrift, which is one of the things that makes him entertaining to follow. If anybody's offended by what he said, they're at liberty not to go to the trouble of following him and reading what he tweets

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    its not like they did it for free our loans made Versailles look generous.

    As pointed out late to the party with their hand out.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    We'd been battered to tulip for years before they finally decided to help us. Yeah, thanks for finally joining in, but we're expected to be at their beck and call for the Gulf War and other pet capitalist projects of theirs?

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Yeager replied: “Arrogant. Nasty to Americans when we were over there saving them. Nasty when I visited a few years ago - wanted a whole lot for nothing.”
    Maybe responding to the attitude they were being handed out?

    My granddad is a year older than him and an ex military major, he's a miserable feckin' chunt too.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    I actually doubt how much tweeting these old war veterans actually do.

    I'm pretty sure @Harryslaststand is in a box under the shed and it's his dreadlocked crusty grandson belting out the social justice warrior tweets all day.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    started a topic Chuck Yeager

    Chuck Yeager

    WWII flying ace Chuck Yeager in extraordinary attack on 'nasty' and 'arrogant' British people

    The US only joined the war to fight the Japs.

    And the US would not have been first to break the sound barrier without UK technical help.

Working...
X