Moderation is fine, but in moderation - please.

[vetran]

Not every time. Only when there's more than a couple of posts from you that are simply "I read somewhere" brainfarts. When they're relevant to current events, there's no problem. But if everyone posted like you do,all we'd have is pages and pages of links.

Sorry I'll just post Bremoaner drivel and about cars/airplanes.

[FatLazyContractor]

Sycophantic Twunt.

Welcome back shaunbhoy.

[shaunbhoy]

Eliminate Churchill and MF. Problem solved.

Sycophantic Twunt.

[FatLazyContractor]

You saying he's not like ????

No, he is re-iterating the point.

[FatLazyContractor]

FAO Admin

Eliminate Churchill and MF. Problem solved.

[NotAllThere]

OK, It's no secret that NAT and I have history

We do? I hadn't notice. Who are you again?

Is this a new game for the mods?

Nope. Same one for years and years.

Nat is being a bit of a numpty with "I read somewhere" I found I read in the daiiy mail mildly funny but now its every time I create a post which is a PITA. Maybe I should only create posts about Brexit, cars & football?

Not every time. Only when there's more than a couple of posts from you that are simply "I read somewhere" brainfarts. When they're relevant to current events, there's no problem. But if everyone posted like you do,all we'd have is pages and pages of links.

[TestMangler]

Examples? I have met NAT and I don't think he works that way. A lot of the time people have been warned before bans have been issued. I don't think there is any sneaky agenda to goad people into a ban. But please Churchill, feel free to start up a new thread to say that MF is a tired old sack of tulipe, I seem to remember that being the done thing when a poster returns from a break of any length

You saying he's not like ????

[vetran]

Nat is being a bit of a numpty with "I read somewhere" I found I read in the daiiy mail mildly funny but now its every time I create a post which is a PITA. Maybe I should only create posts about Brexit, cars & football?

[administrator]

I can do you a signed copy of that for a fiver if you are interested? I wrote most of it.

[administrator]

Examples? I have met NAT and I don't think he works that way. A lot of the time people have been warned before bans have been issued. I don't think there is any sneaky agenda to goad people into a ban. But please Churchill, feel free to start up a new thread to say that MF is a tired old sack of tulipe, I seem to remember that being the done thing when a poster returns from a break of any length

[greenlake]

[AtW]

25,943

[Churchill]

OK, It's no secret that NAT and I have history but let's put this aside.

Over the past 12 months, I've self moderated my postings, that doesn't mean that I've not been looking around the forum in the meantime.

In that meantime I've observed that NAT has played a more than passive role in certain topics, goading certain members so that he/she has enough collateral to ban them.

Is this a new game for the mods?