• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: PM FAO NickFitz

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "PM FAO NickFitz"

Collapse

  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Yep, I think they added that between the chap next to me at ClientCo discussing it earlier and you posting it
    Of course it's complete bollix, can you imagine Crapita getting this to work (if it were practical and legal)? Me neither.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    They actually put a disclaimer to that effect on the bottom of the article
    Yep, I think they added that between the chap next to me at ClientCo discussing it earlier and you posting it

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    The BBC said the story was utter bollocks yesterday - they don't need to snoop on wi-fi to "detect" you is the official line.

    I note that El Reg is careful to phrase the story as merely reporting what the Telegraph is saying, to avoid giving the impression that they believe such an obvious load of bollocks

    Further proof that the Telegraph probably shouldn't have sacked all its science and technology reporters the other year
    They actually put a disclaimer to that effect on the bottom of the article

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    The BBC said the story was utter bollocks yesterday - they don't need to snoop on wi-fi to "detect" you is the official line.

    I note that El Reg is careful to phrase the story as merely reporting what the Telegraph is saying, to avoid giving the impression that they believe such an obvious load of bollocks

    Further proof that the Telegraph probably shouldn't have sacked all its science and technology reporters the other year

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    started a topic PM FAO NickFitz

    PM FAO NickFitz

    Look out, they're coming to get you!

    BBC detector vans are back to spy on your home Wi-Fi – if you can believe it • The Register

Working...
X