A good Brexit article with some home truths for both sides

[NigelJK]

The fact that he had to plug his own book on Economics (despite also saying he got it wrong) says it all really.

[NotAllThere]

Interesting idea that Dave expected another coalition, and so planned to drop the referendum pledge and put the blame on those pesky liberals.

[OwlHoot]

Once I made the font bigger so I could see it that was a pretty good article.

Besides a few minor concessions that were and are obvious to everyone anyway, certainly now if not before the vote, it is an ardent Remainer's pitch for a free trade agreement as similar as possible to having stayed in the EU

But in fairness, the author does point out that this will not be at all acceptable to the vast majority of Brexiters, if it entails freedom of movement.

[CretinWatcher]

Is this your life now, telling everyone the sky is falling, when everything points to the opposite?

Get over it, you sound pathetic.

Did the article have too many big words and concepts for you?
You know, Dim, all your problems stem from a lack of IQ and EQ.
It must take someone very blinkered to think that all the signs are pointing to a boom in the UK economy. Or thick as mince

[GB9]

Self indulgent drivel spouting the usual loser's misconceptions about the vote.

[VectraMan]

Once I made the font bigger so I could see it that was a pretty good article.

[Old Greg]

Is this your life now, telling everyone the sky is falling, when everything points to the opposite?

Get over it, you sound pathetic.

+1. UK PLC is getting more competitive all the time with the decrease in economic activity and the devaluation of GBP!

[DimPrawn]

Is this your life now, telling everyone the sky is falling, when everything points to the opposite?

Get over it, you sound pathetic.

[CretinWatcher]

John Lanchester · Brexit Blues · LRB 28 July 2016