We had cutting edge technology for our exams - were allowed to use Slide Rules
I had my own PDP11 running DSM (Digital Standard Mumps) for a while till replacing it with a Compaq 386SX - sold it to some bod providing support to fleet street iirc.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Aw diddums, in my day...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Aw diddums, in my day..."
Collapse
-
Our PDP-8/e had two Teletypes and a VDU attached to it. One day, somebody wrote a program for use only on the VDU: it printed "I", then backspaced and printed "O", then backspaced, and looped back to the beginning. Due to the low speed of the serial connection from the computer to the VDU, this gave the impression of a spinning disk.
That was the first example of computer animation I ever saw
Leave a comment:
-
You are missing a zeroOriginally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostAt least the maths was simple in your day.
2 x teachers wage =
Leave a comment:
-
At least the maths was simple in your day.
2 x teachers wage =
Leave a comment:
-
Are you saying size matters?Originally posted by SueEllen View PostWell they may have had British born and educated female primary school teachers like one I met who stated "Maths is hard" and "Girls can't do Maths anyway".
Myself and the other more mature lady, with a Maths degree, I was standing next to were too stunted to act or reply.
Leave a comment:
-
Well they may have had British born and educated female primary school teachers like one I met who stated "Maths is hard" and "Girls can't do Maths anyway".Originally posted by zeitghostAh yes, but you knew about hundreds, tens and units, unlike the present unfortunates.
And the advantage of knowing your times tables.
We (me & a lecturer) were gobsmacked at the way the esteemed customers were taught to do multiplication.
I'm not sure we ever found out how they do long division.
Myself and the other more mature lady, with a Maths degree, I was standing next to were too stunted to act or reply.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm not really into Euclidean geometry, when I younger perhaps.Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
rational
(assuming you mean real numbers used in numerical calculations)
Leave a comment:
-
Whole numbers as in ...Originally posted by scooterscot View PostTechnically all numbers are whole. I wonder if they're talking about integers...
The numbers {0, 1, 2, 3, ...} etc. There is no fractional or decimal part. And no negatives.
Leave a comment:
-
Another old chuntOriginally posted by NickFitz View PostPublic school, though I got there on the 11-plus
It was either the first or second school in the UK to have its own computer on the premises (historians are, I believe, uncertain) - I think it arrived around 1972 or 1973, a short while before me. As I recall it was donated by a rich parent.
Around 1977 funds were allocated to buy an additional 8K of core. The canny teachers responsible for it waited a year or so, and spent the money instead on two SWTPC-6800 machines, each with 64K of RAM, one with twin floppies and the other with a cassette interface. Even the cassettes were faster than the punched paper tape we'd been used to. Halcyon days
Leave a comment:
-
Technically all numbers are whole. I wonder if they're talking about integers...
Leave a comment:
-
Public school, though I got there on the 11-plusOriginally posted by adubya View PostYour school had a PDP-8 ?
Independent school ?
We had a RM 380Z
It was either the first or second school in the UK to have its own computer on the premises (historians are, I believe, uncertain) - I think it arrived around 1972 or 1973, a short while before me. As I recall it was donated by a rich parent.
Around 1977 funds were allocated to buy an additional 8K of core. The canny teachers responsible for it waited a year or so, and spent the money instead on two SWTPC-6800 machines, each with 64K of RAM, one with twin floppies and the other with a cassette interface. Even the cassettes were faster than the punched paper tape we'd been used to. Halcyon days
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Leave a comment: