• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "I read it on a UKIP pamplet"

Collapse

  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Originally posted by GJABS View Post
    The desire to get rid of windfarms is more to do with the fact that they kill wild birds, mess with aviation (we nearly lost our local airfield when they tried to build one nearby), are unreliable (don't work when there's no wind) and mess up the visual landscape for miles around.
    They also don't work when it is too windy LMFAO!

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Radiation from it is sustainable for a few thousand years ...
    Long enough a time frame for us to achieve stable fusion reactors then.

    https://www.iter.org/

    Leave a comment:


  • GJABS
    replied
    The desire to get rid of windfarms is more to do with the fact that they kill wild birds, mess with aviation (we nearly lost our local airfield when they tried to build one nearby), are unreliable (don't work when there's no wind) and mess up the visual landscape for miles around.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    Surely nuclear is the only sustainable energy?
    Radiation from it is sustainable for a few thousand years ...

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Go back to your kipper meeting along with the rest of the nasty little people that the UK seems to be breeding now and explain it to them or are you the author of said pamphlet, which wouldn't surprise me in the very least
    play the ball, not the man!

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Yup, it looks like dumbstadt is hopelessly confused about the distinction between "sustainable" and "renewable".
    Go back to your kipper meeting along with the rest of the nasty little people that the UK seems to be breeding now and explain it to them or are you the author of said pamphlet, which wouldn't surprise me in the very least

    Technologies that promote sustainable energy include renewable energy sources, such as hydroelectricity, solar energy, wind energy, wave power, geothermal energy, bioenergy, tidal power and also technologies designed to improve energy efficiency.
    All renewable energy sources like solar, wind, geothermal, hydropower, wave and tidal power are forms of sustainable energy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Yup, it looks like dumbstadt is hopelessly confused about the distinction between "sustainable" and "renewable".
    Sadly, as are most of the Cabinet...

    Leave a comment:


  • stek
    replied
    Everyone knows too many wind farms will stop the wind. Just like tidal wave energy will stop the tides and cause the moon to leave earth orbit just like Space: 1999.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    Surely nuclear is the only sustainable energy?
    Yup, it looks like dumbstadt is hopelessly confused about the distinction between "sustainable" and "renewable".

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Maybe it's because historically speaking windfarms aren't especially effective as sustainable energy sources.

    Something to do with the amount of energy consumed in the production, installation, support and operation of the devices and the unreliability of the wind.

    I know that Germany loves them these days, but don't those of a boxhead persuasion import rather a lot of energy from countries with real powerstations or large hydro installations to cope with the gap left by the oh so green windfarms?

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Surely nuclear is the only sustainable energy?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    started a topic I read it on a UKIP pamplet

    I read it on a UKIP pamplet

    Now I understand why some people on here are UKIP fans



    Is it cos I is fick?

    Ukip candidate asks: what happens when renewable energy runs out? | Politics | The Guardian

Working...
X