• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Un-feckin-believable!"

Collapse

  • seanraaron
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    so make the checks even less subtle and put a third party in charge of it.

    The courts could mandate such tests to make the Police beyond reproach.
    You'd have to get the courts to try it in the first place. Chicago's problem is that the entire justice system has been enabling police brutality. It's going to take the Federal inquiry to force change, not just better video tech, though this kind of monitoring will be needed to try to rebuild public trust if nothing else.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    I would prefer they are sacked for beating up a dashcam than a citizen. Let the local civil rights organisation monitor it.
    Digital rights organisation covers computer equipment damaged in the line of duty right?

    They'd be all over this:
    Man jailed for throwing Prestwich Library computer at the wall - because it would not print (From Prestwich and Whitefield Guide)

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    You're talking about guys who know there's a dash cam recording but still do this stuff anyway. I wouldn't let them near a hard drive.
    I would prefer they are sacked for beating up a dashcam than a citizen. Let the local civil rights organisation monitor it.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    indeed but if it can't be done wirelessly for security reasons then a USB stick with encrypted recordings & status makes sense. Initialise stick at station so you know last recording, insert in car and it downloads from last recording or errors because it hasn't been downloaded recently and won't go onto stick. Sergeant comes out and sticks the usb hard drive in, he nags the last driver for not downloading.
    You're talking about guys who know there's a dash cam recording but still do this stuff anyway. I wouldn't let them near a hard drive.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by seanraaron View Post
    After reading the article about tampering I don't get the sense the sabotage has been that subtle...
    so make the checks even less subtle and put a third party in charge of it.

    The courts could mandate such tests to make the Police beyond reproach.

    Leave a comment:


  • seanraaron
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    indeed but if it can't be done wirelessly for security reasons then a USB stick with encrypted recordings & status makes sense. Initialise stick at station so you know last recording, insert in car and it downloads from last recording or errors because it hasn't been downloaded recently and won't go onto stick. Sergeant comes out and sticks the usb hard drive in, he nags the last driver for not downloading.
    After reading the article about tampering I don't get the sense the sabotage has been that subtle...

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Surely an automatic upload and wipe when the car is plugged back in at station?
    indeed but if it can't be done wirelessly for security reasons then a USB stick with encrypted recordings & status makes sense. Initialise stick at station so you know last recording, insert in car and it downloads from last recording or errors because it hasn't been downloaded recently and won't go onto stick. Sergeant comes out and sticks the usb hard drive in, he nags the last driver for not downloading.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    should be locked in a safe built into the car and keys kept with the garage staff. Random audits checking the video & audio. That way there is no suggestion of tampering by Police. Diagnostic switch at on / off and automatic reporting would make sure you can't go out with a faulty vehicle.

    I assumed the uploads were automatic when the cars returned? With 240gb SSDs at £50 it should be possible to store days or weeks of video in the car. Take a 64GB usb drive in to the station when you finish your shift.

    Its a no brainer.
    Surely an automatic upload and wipe when the car is plugged back in at station?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mincepie
    replied
    we should have a whip round for him

    Leave a comment:


  • seanraaron
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    The Chicago police have been repeatedly sabotaging their dashcams: Chicago Police Officers Tampered With Dash Cams -- NYMag
    They really need to clean house there and fire a lot of cops. There's been too much of a blind eye from the mayor's office and the attorney general in Chicago for far too long.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    The Chicago police have been repeatedly sabotaging their dashcams: Chicago Police Officers Tampered With Dash Cams -- NYMag
    should be locked in a safe built into the car and keys kept with the garage staff. Random audits checking the video & audio. That way there is no suggestion of tampering by Police. Diagnostic switch at on / off and automatic reporting would make sure you can't go out with a faulty vehicle.

    I assumed the uploads were automatic when the cars returned? With 240gb SSDs at £50 it should be possible to store days or weeks of video in the car. Take a 64GB usb drive in to the station when you finish your shift.

    Its a no brainer.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by seanraaron View Post
    Most yank cop cars have dash cams which have captured some outrageous activity, so it's not a universal deterrent for bad cop behaviour, but regardless body-cams would probably be a good idea.
    The Chicago police have been repeatedly sabotaging their dashcams: Chicago Police Officers Tampered With Dash Cams -- NYMag

    Leave a comment:


  • seanraaron
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    In this day and age, it's a no brainer. Protects the public and the police officers.

    No doubt in a lot of these shooting cases, the footage would go missing or some technical fault prevented it being recorded...
    You'd think so, but given the stuff captured by officer's own dash cams I can only assume they forget it's there or they don't understand the tech.

    You'd probably want it doing live streaming to a remote location with some kind of local storage for backup. Circumventing would require a greater level of premeditation than is apparent in many of these incidents. Alternatively IAB could have drones situated to be able to rapidly respond to any officer report that they're checking out a situation and spy on them?

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    In this day and age, it's a no brainer. Protects the public and the police officers.

    No doubt in a lot of these shooting cases, the footage would go missing or some technical fault prevented it being recorded...
    If you have nothing to hide why would you complain?

    Isn't that the logic the Govt. used for the "snoopers charter" that is being shot down (pun intended)

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    lawyers playing the game. police wearing cameras needed.
    That worked well at Waterloo underground didn't it....

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X