• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Government gets another spanking in the Lords."

Collapse

  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    The cheeky sods, normally members of the Lords have to pay for a good spanking

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    Just had the 'Tax summary' for the wife. The portion on 'Welfare' was about the same as that for 'NHS'. Wonder what the overlap is. Wonder if working makes you fitter so you don't need the NHS part as much.

    Leave a comment:


  • seanraaron
    replied
    Yes because people out of work are all lazy, shiftless bastards. The distance between your bed and sleeping rough on the streets isn't as big as you'd like to think unless you have a robust welfare state or are independently wealthy. But by all means do the monkey dance and follow America's lead...

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by NigelJK View Post
    Odd isn't it how 'Workless' = 'Poverty'.
    Is it odd?

    Is it really odd that lazy workshy fecks who do not get out of bed before midday have less money than those who are at work at 8?

    Not really sure that's odd?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by NigelJK View Post
    Odd isn't it how 'Workless' = 'Poverty'.
    Indeed. Lets increase benefits to £1000 a day and fix the issue. Its what bankers get so why not the other feckless.

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    Odd isn't it how 'Workless' = 'Poverty'.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    started a topic Government gets another spanking in the Lords.

    Government gets another spanking in the Lords.

    This time over trying to redefine Child Poverty measurements without actually including house hold income as a measure.

    Government loses major House of Lords vote to redefine child poverty | UK Politics | News | The Independent

    The Government has suffered a major defeat in the House of Lords over its plans to change the way that child poverty is measured.

    Peers voted 290 to 192 in favour of an amendment to that will force the Government to publish annual figures on income-related child poverty.

    Ministers had wanted to scrap income-related measures and replace them with other indicators, including the numbers of children living in workless households.

    The plans were opposed by child poverty charities, and have been challenged by the respected social mobility commission, chaired by former Labour minister Alan Milburn, which said last month that it was “not credible” to tackle child poverty without acknowledging “the most obvious symptom of poverty, lack of money”.

Working...
X