Originally posted by quackhandle
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Gah! Yet even more Hillsborough
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Gah! Yet even more Hillsborough"
Collapse
-
Also to bear in mind is the fact that a year earlier the same two teams played in an FA Cup Semi final at the same ground with the fans in the same ends.
It was (for the time) properly policed with fans being lined up a distance away from the turnstiles, with tickets being checked. A year later and Match Commander Duckenfield had never taken charge of a football match before let alone a high profile one. He got the job approx 10 days before the game. He has admitted that he lied during the previous inquest.
qh
Leave a comment:
-
Exactly the same thing happened at Burnden Park in 1946. Bloke concerned about the safety of his kid opened a gate and everyone flooded in, 33 crushed to death....Originally posted by LondonManc View PostI'd potentially say that there's two different cases to argue, one each for those killed before and after the poor response decisions taken by SYP.
The first case was, regardless of what people say, a terrible accident caused by a variety of factors. The ground was a death trap waiting to happen, but the lack of CCTV back in the day contributed to both the violence culture and the "jibbing in" culture perpetuated the need for pens/paddocks. Ten minutes before kick off and the crowds wanted to get in to watch an FA Cup semi final. Many didn't have tickets. Someone opens a gate to alleviate the pressure at the gate to prevent a crush there. Naturally, the ticketless ones in the crowd see this as fair game for getting in to see the match. No match officials (police, SWFC, etc.) were there to point fans into the empty pens at the side.
The second case was the failed response and ensuing cover up by the authorities. Even commentator Graham Beecroft was dismissed as lying to cover this up and Beeky's integrity was second-to-none. Of course, this is all alien to those who don't remember when the papers controlled popular opinion before the internet. They couldn't have got away with it in a day with so many camera phones pointed at them.
Personally, I feel sorry for the person who gave the command to open the gate because they thought they were saving lives by mitigating the crush outside the Leppings Lane end.
I wish Liverpool FC nothing but ill fortune on the pitch but no supporter should go to a game and not come home.
Leave a comment:
-
I'd potentially say that there's two different cases to argue, one each for those killed before and after the poor response decisions taken by SYP.
The first case was, regardless of what people say, a terrible accident caused by a variety of factors. The ground was a death trap waiting to happen, but the lack of CCTV back in the day contributed to both the violence culture and the "jibbing in" culture perpetuated the need for pens/paddocks. Ten minutes before kick off and the crowds wanted to get in to watch an FA Cup semi final. Many didn't have tickets. Someone opens a gate to alleviate the pressure at the gate to prevent a crush there. Naturally, the ticketless ones in the crowd see this as fair game for getting in to see the match. No match officials (police, SWFC, etc.) were there to point fans into the empty pens at the side.
The second case was the failed response and ensuing cover up by the authorities. Even commentator Graham Beecroft was dismissed as lying to cover this up and Beeky's integrity was second-to-none. Of course, this is all alien to those who don't remember when the papers controlled popular opinion before the internet. They couldn't have got away with it in a day with so many camera phones pointed at them.
Personally, I feel sorry for the person who gave the command to open the gate because they thought they were saving lives by mitigating the crush outside the Leppings Lane end.
I wish Liverpool FC nothing but ill fortune on the pitch but no supporter should go to a game and not come home.
Leave a comment:
-
Why has it taken so long? They should get it through quicker like that Chilcott one.
Leave a comment:
-
They should hold a public enquiry into why there's been so many public enquiries.
Leave a comment:
-
Is there such a thing as Scouse tax payer?Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostHillsborough inquests: Jury to consider if victims 'unlawfully killed' - BBC News
And it still goes on until the 22-Feb. To whit, regardless of the outcome, we'll then have Hillsborough Ambulance chasing lawyers for the next few years looking out for huge payouts from non-scouse tax payers (Nothing new there then - Ed. ) or the 'it's a cover-up, we want to do it again then, won't they hey!' pantomime.
I wish they'd only cover this in Merseyside. No-one gives a tulip anywhere else.

Leave a comment:
-
Gah! Yet even more Hillsborough
Hillsborough inquests: Jury to consider if victims 'unlawfully killed' - BBC News
And it still goes on until the 22-Feb. To whit, regardless of the outcome, we'll then have Hillsborough Ambulance chasing lawyers for the next few years looking out for huge payouts from non-scouse tax payers (Nothing new there then - Ed. ) or the 'it's a cover-up, we want to do it again then, won't they hey!' pantomime.
I wish they'd only cover this in Merseyside. No-one gives a tulip anywhere else.
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Today 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Yesterday 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18

Leave a comment: