• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "2% sounds like a bargain!"

Collapse

  • NigelJK
    replied
    So to sum up why there are few to no worthwhile UK tech companies: the government doesn't do enough to support domestic industry and people get paid too much?
    Nope, UK Govt. should start backing those businesses when they want to enforce their (costly) Patents, in any Country that has signed said agreement. Caveat Emptor any countries that aren't.

    Leave a comment:


  • seanraaron
    replied
    So to sum up why there are few to no worthwhile UK tech companies: the government doesn't do enough to support domestic industry and people get paid too much?

    Seems about right to me. Maybe devaluing the £ is part of a grand secret scheme to bring manufacturing back to Britain?

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    Would this be the same UK Govt. that hung him out to dry when Hoover infringed his Patents, Copywrites and Innovations Treaty then? And left him to find his own private case all the way to the US Supreme court, with no diplomatic help?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Nope Dyson was shown the profit figures between keeping manufacturing in UK versus moving offshore, Dyson took the money for which he should have lost his knighthood
    I was under the impression that he wanted to build his factory where he wasn't allowed to build it, some permissions or something, so in a fit of pique (and because it was cheaper) he buggered off to Malaysia whereas I'm pretty sure that he could have moved his factory to the North of England and got some grants as well...

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    No, Germans keep manufacturing to high standards. Have a read up on the Fraunhofer Society; very interesting.
    I thought they were more in the bullying people for patent royalties business.

    If you've ever listened to an MP3 you probably owe them money.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by seanraaron View Post
    Dyson offshored manufacturing because British workers are tulipe then?
    No, Germans keep manufacturing to high standards. Have a read up on the Fraunhofer Society; very interesting.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Nope Dyson was shown the profit figures between keeping manufacturing in UK versus moving offshore, Dyson took the money for which he should have lost his knighthood
    why do other knights cut off their noses to spite their faces?

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by seanraaron View Post
    Dyson offshored manufacturing because British workers are tulipe then?
    Nope Dyson was shown the profit figures between keeping manufacturing in UK versus moving offshore, Dyson took the money for which he should have lost his knighthood

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Reputation for quality.

    New to the Rover Metro?
    It was rhetorical

    So what's changed from bashing bits of metal to make a Metro and going out of business, to bashing bits of metal and making £2.5 billion

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Makes you wonder why a successful economy like Germany is still making stuff
    they automated heavily and adopted the Japanese attitude to quality.

    Machines & organisation can make manufacturing cheap wherever.

    Leave a comment:


  • seanraaron
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    Reputation for quality.

    New to the Rover Metro?
    Dyson offshored manufacturing because British workers are tulipe then?

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Makes you wonder why a successful economy like Germany is still making stuff
    Reputation for quality.

    New to the Rover Metro?

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    We are still making stuff, only once we have it bedded in we put the production lines in where it's best bang for your QA buck.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Spartan
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Makes you wonder why a successful economy like Germany is still making stuff
    As they're able to undercut the other European economies

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by NigelJK View Post
    Not sure if you're aware but only 5% of the profit comes from manufacturing. Plus you don't get the constant union interference pushing up the prices, win-win.
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    So where does the other 95% come from? As for your second statement, then all manufacturing should be sent abroad so the idle working classes can continue to get benefits and by working classes that also includes IT techies
    Makes you wonder why a successful economy like Germany is still making stuff

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X